From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:58113 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759278Ab0LNPZm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:25:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] iwlagn: rename enhanced txpower fields From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" To: Johannes Berg Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: <1292311038.3569.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1292285372-11373-1-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> <1292285372-11373-7-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> <1292311038.3569.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:24:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1292340273.9665.2.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johannes, On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 23:17 -0800, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 16:09 -0800, Wey-Yi Guy wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg > > > > Some fields we didn't previously use from the > > enhanced TX power structure will be needed in > > the next patch, so rename them to their correct > > names to be able to use them and change code > > reading them accordingly. > > Would probably be better to get this and the 7/14 patch by merging > wireless-2.6, rather than applying the patch again. > THat was my original plan, but the patch apply to wireless-2.6 is not exactly the same as the one apply to wireless-next-2.6 since there are number of patches apply to the same area. Also if holding those 2 patches, I am also holding a lot of other patches following. Wey