From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:57:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293037067.3997.42.camel@wwguy-huron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222131515.GA2242@redhat.com>
Stanislaw,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 05:15 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi Wey
>
> > > > If its is 2.4, we need to use the correct tx antenna, I think we can
> > > > remove this block of code all together since check already done above.
> > > >
> > > > if (priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band])
> > > > scan_tx_antennas = priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band];
> > >
> > > Is correct to use all antennas on 5GHz when blutooth is enabled?
> > > For me, more logical would be limiting to one antenna no matter of band,
> > > since antennas are used anyway, only frequencies differ.
> > >
> > > For rx_ant, we do not check the band, only limit to first one
> > > when bluetooth is used.
> >
> > there is no BT coex if 5GHz is used because there is not interference
> > between 2.4 and 5GHz, so both antenna can be used. WiFi should operated
> > in normal condition.
> >
> > For 2.4GHz, we also can use both antenna if there is not high traffic
> > load on BT side.
> >
> > but you have a good catch, driver need to check band before use it
> > (scan_tx_antenna[band])
>
> So how about this patch (rfc only):
>
> From 26d0570ed5cd85097702d0fedb2c3f831dce9714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:03:31 +0100
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band
>
> Looks that we do not set correctly antennas when scanning
> on 5Ghz band and when bluetooth is enabled, because
> priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band] is only defined for
> IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ.
>
> To fix we check band before limiting antennas to first one.
> This allow to remove hard coded cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band].
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c | 7 +------
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 9 +++------
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
> index f4bec32..af505bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
> @@ -596,12 +596,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6005_2bg_cfg = {
> .need_dc_calib = true, \
> .need_temp_offset_calib = true, \
> .led_mode = IWL_LED_RF_STATE, \
> - .adv_pm = true, \
> - /* \
> - *Due to bluetooth, we transmit 2.4 GHz probes \
> - * only on antenna A \
> - */ \
> - .scan_tx_antennas[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ] = ANT_A
> + .adv_pm = true \
>
> struct iwl_cfg iwl6030_2agn_cfg = {
> .name = "Intel(R) Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6230 AGN",
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> index 4bc82fc..322a2bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> @@ -1492,15 +1492,12 @@ int iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> if (priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band])
> rx_ant = priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band];
>
> - if (priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band])
> - scan_tx_antennas = priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band];
> -
> - if (priv->cfg->bt_params &&
> + if (band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ &&
> + priv->cfg->bt_params &&
> priv->cfg->bt_params->advanced_bt_coexist &&
> priv->bt_full_concurrent) {
> /* operated as 1x1 in full concurrency mode */
> - scan_tx_antennas = first_antenna(
> - priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band]);
> + scan_tx_antennas = first_antenna(scan_tx_antennas);
> }
Please remove the checking for priv->bt_full_concurrent, so the checking
will apply to all scan request if BT coex is there.
otherwise, the patch looks ok
thanks
Wey
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-20 17:05 [PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-20 18:13 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-21 12:05 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-21 17:21 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-22 13:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-22 16:57 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1293037067.3997.42.camel@wwguy-huron \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).