From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:2974 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379Ab1AETyB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:54:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath5k: move nohwcrypt to ath_common structure From: Joe Perches To: Bob Copeland Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net In-Reply-To: References: <1294255328-14322-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <1294256409.12561.8.camel@Joe-Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:53:59 -0800 Message-ID: <1294257239.12561.12.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:49 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:22 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h > > [] > >> + bool nohwcrypt; > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c > >> -int modparam_nohwcrypt; > >> +static int modparam_nohwcrypt; > >> module_param_named(nohwcrypt, modparam_nohwcrypt, bool, S_IRUGO); > > bool/int matching? > It used to be the case that you had to use ints here. Google tells me > that changed about 2 years ago, so bool should be ok. bool is OK. modparam_nohwcrypt is declared int and should be declared bool. Also should be declared and used as bool in ath9k and ath9k_htc too.