From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] wl12xx: AP-mode - fix race condition on sta connection
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:21:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296116485.3622.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127002034.GA18234@jm.kir.nu>
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 02:20 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:08:39PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > If we add the station before the response frame's ACK is received, we
> > still have the race, and we need to delete if we don't get the ACK. If
> > we add the station before we send the assoc response we get rid of this
> > race, but also have to delete if we don't get the ACK. I guess that case
> > is actually nicer in some way since we would have allowed the station to
> > connect, so if spurious data frames go up because we don't get an ACK
> > from the station that's no big deal?
>
> From the correctness view point, the STA entry would need to be enabled
> (added/marked associated) at the moment the ACK frame is received. Since
> we do some internal processing between kernel and user space, there is
> obviously some latency involved. The most correct mechanism would be to
> make hostapd add a not-associated-STA entry before sending association
> response with status code 0 and request mac80211 to mark it associated
> automatically on TX status report (showing success) from the driver.
> However, for practical purposes, that may be too complex and doing what
> you describe above is likely good enough.
It's possible to do that as well -- but do we want to change any of
this? It might be good, but it's mostly a hostapd change I think?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-16 5:42 [PATCH 00/10] wl12xx: AP-mode per link PSM Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] wl12xx: fix potential race condition with TX queue watermark Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] wl12xx: AP-mode - fix race condition on sta connection Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-26 14:01 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-01-26 20:04 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-26 21:28 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-01-26 21:33 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-26 21:44 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-26 21:54 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-26 22:02 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-26 22:08 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-26 22:16 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-26 23:11 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-27 0:20 ` Jouni Malinen
2011-01-27 8:21 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] wl12xx: AP-mode - TX queue per link in AC Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] mac80211: do not calc frame duration when using HW rate-control Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 8:34 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] wl12xx: report invalid TX rate when returning non-TX-ed skbs Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-27 9:51 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-01-27 10:33 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-30 6:57 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] mac80211: add HW flag for disabling auto link-PS in AP mode Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 8:50 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <AANLkTik=WDsehr0EgW7QemfdmokvaLzg1ugASwiuCOXt@mail.gmail.com>
2011-01-16 21:53 ` Fwd: " Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-17 9:35 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-17 22:47 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-18 9:05 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-18 19:17 ` Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-27 11:39 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] wl12xx: AP-mode - support HW based link PS monitoring Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-27 11:41 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] wl12xx: AP mode - fix bug in cleanup of wl1271_op_sta_add() Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] wl12xx: AP-mode - count free FW TX blocks per link Arik Nemtsov
2011-01-16 5:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] wl12xx: AP-mode - management of links in PS-mode Arik Nemtsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296116485.3622.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=arik@wizery.com \
--cc=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).