From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:64657 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752516Ab1A0VlH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:41:07 -0500 Subject: Re: wireless-next-2.6 rebased from b4e69ac670d71b5748dc81e536b2cb103489badd From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" To: "John W. Linville" Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20110127210953.GB2271@tuxdriver.com> References: <20110127210953.GB2271@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:29:02 -0800 Message-ID: <1296163742.27623.0.camel@wwguy-huron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:09 -0800, John W. Linville wrote: > I rebased wireless-next-2.6 to drop a patch that I should have merged > through the fixes track. I just merged it yesterday, so if you haven't > pulled in the last day or so (i.e. you don't have anything beyond > commit b4e69ac670d71b5748dc81e536b2cb103489badd) you should be fine. > > Otherwise, I apologize for the inconvenience to Gustavo, Luca, Wey-yi, > and whomever else might be following wireless-next-2.6 directly. > Thanks to let me know :-) Wey