From: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] iwlwifi: module parameters for health check
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 07:54:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297180497.20613.45.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297172303-17487-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
Hi Stanislaw,
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 05:38 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Currently we unconditionally check "health" and reset radio or whole
> device when bad state is detected.
>
> However that not always work correctly. Particularly plcp check is
> causing very low speed problems on 3945 and low ack check make 5xxx
> devices randomly stop working.
>
> Patch module option to allow to disable this checks. Actually it
> make checks disabled by default, since IMHO they are causing more
> troubles than give help, but that need to be tested.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h | 2 ++
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c | 6 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
> index 2d83f9f..65cfe12 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
> @@ -4795,3 +4795,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(antenna_coupling,
> module_param_named(bt_ch_inhibition, iwlagn_bt_ch_announce, bool, S_IRUGO);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(bt_ch_inhibition,
> "Disable BT channel inhibition (default: enable)");
> +
> +module_param_named(plcp_check, iwlagn_mod_params.plcp_check, bool, S_IRUGO);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(plcp_check, "Check plcp health (default: 0 [disabled])");
> +
> +module_param_named(ack_check, iwlagn_mod_params.ack_check, bool, S_IRUGO);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ack_check, "Check ack health (default: 0 [disabled])");
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
> index 9e7a6d1..96f07d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,8 @@ struct iwl_mod_params {
> int amsdu_size_8K; /* def: 1 = enable 8K amsdu size */
> int antenna; /* def: 0 = both antennas (use diversity) */
> int restart_fw; /* def: 1 = restart firmware */
> + bool plcp_check; /* def: false = disable plcp health check */
> + bool ack_check; /* def: false = disable ack health check */
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c
> index b9c2591..8a1a483 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c
> @@ -238,14 +238,16 @@ void iwl_recover_from_statistics(struct iwl_priv *priv,
> !iwl_is_any_associated(priv))
> return;
>
> - if (priv->cfg->ops->lib->check_ack_health &&
> + if (priv->cfg->mod_params->ack_check &&
> + priv->cfg->ops->lib->check_ack_health &&
> !priv->cfg->ops->lib->check_ack_health(priv, pkt)) {
> IWL_ERR(priv, "low ack count detected, restart firmware\n");
> if (!iwl_force_reset(priv, IWL_FW_RESET, false))
> return;
> }
>
> - if (priv->cfg->ops->lib->check_plcp_health &&
> + if (priv->cfg->mod_params->plcp_check &&
> + priv->cfg->ops->lib->check_plcp_health &&
> !priv->cfg->ops->lib->check_plcp_health(priv, pkt, msecs))
> iwl_force_reset(priv, IWL_RF_RESET, false);
> }
I am even thinking remove it for 3945 all together.
for agn device, I agree disable "low_ack_check" by default, not so sure
about plcp_health
Wey
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-08 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 13:38 [RFC/RFT] iwlwifi: module parameters for health check Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-02-08 15:54 ` wwguy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297180497.20613.45.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox