From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:48413 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059Ab1BNP27 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:28:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iwl3945: iwl3945_good_plcp_health might not used From: wwguy To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: <20110214090620.GE2327@redhat.com> References: <1297354593-22897-1-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> <20110211144951.GA2278@redhat.com> <1297437769.20613.1300.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> <20110214090620.GE2327@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:27:08 -0800 Message-ID: <1297697228.4723.5.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 01:06 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > Hi Wey > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:22:49AM -0800, wwguy wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 06:49 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16:33AM -0800, Wey-Yi Guy wrote: > > > > remove plcp check for 3945, mark the function __maybe_unused > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy > > > > Cc: # .35+: c91d015: iwl3945: remove plcp check > > > > Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.35+ > > > > --- > > > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > > > I see your point, but I also think it des not mean other driver doing > > bad, so we can do it too. do you agree? > > Fully agree :-) > > > I like to see the iwlwifi driver > > as clean as possible (do our best :-)) > > hope it is ok for you. > > Of course it is. But I do not complained about fixing warning, but about > posting it to -stable. Thats clearly not -stable fix as stated in > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt . > > I should have add that __maybe_unused to my patch, but I didn't. > What we could do now is fix warning in upstream and live with it > in -stable . > yeap, I agree with you , no need to go to _stable Wey