From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Vivek Natarajan <vivek.natraj@gmail.com>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: Fix a race on enabling power save.
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:44:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297773858.3935.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=eJf+ge7_w1-r1hmZE0aaPzm_NP-Y-v81uctXG@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:43 +0530, Vivek Natarajan wrote:
> > Maybe the subif queues should be stopped, then flush, then tx nullfunc,
> > then stop all queues to configure the HW or something like that?
>
> I tried this sequence:
> the subif queues stopped, then flush, then tx nullfunc, and wake subif
> queues,(we cannot have the queues stopped till we receive tx_status
> because nullfunc might have failed during tx path itself and mac80211
> will not receive tx_status)
I've recently been thinking about this -- I'm thinking that maybe we
should change this behaviour. Right now the tx() routine basically
always returns OK (except in at76) and I suppose instead it could return
whether the frame was queued up successfully...
> After some time interval, once again stop queues on receiving ack for
> nullfunc, configure the hw and then wake up queues. So, during the
> above time interval, there is a race of queuing a frame to the hw. I
> have tested this and the issue is quickly reproducible.
Right. The code that sends the nullfunc -- I think it can probably
sleep? If so, instead of starting the queue for the TX it could just
flush TX again after sending the nullfunc -- after that either it had
status for the frame, or the frame was dropped, no?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 12:25 [PATCH v2] mac80211: Fix a race on enabling power save Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-04 13:05 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-04 13:07 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-04 13:08 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-04 13:12 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-04 13:28 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-04 14:08 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-04 14:28 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-15 14:28 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-08 10:13 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-15 12:44 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-02-15 14:04 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-15 14:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-15 14:41 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-16 9:31 ` Vivek Natarajan
2011-02-16 11:11 ` Johannes Berg
2011-02-16 12:28 ` Vivek Natarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297773858.3935.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vivek.natraj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).