From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>
Cc: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] wifi: libertas: fix OOB read from firmware pkt_ptr offset in RX path
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:23:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12e43b5e8b8db797fa43f4a2cc8b8e5e489c4397.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421135027.357622-2-tristmd@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2026-04-21 at 13:50 +0000, Tristan Madani wrote:
> From: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
>
> lbs_process_rxed_packet() uses the firmware-supplied pkt_ptr as an
> offset into the skb data without validating that it falls within the
> skb buffer bounds. A malicious pkt_ptr value causes out-of-bounds
> memory access when the function subsequently reads ethernet header
> fields from p_rx_pkt.
>
> Add a bounds check to ensure pkt_ptr plus the minimum packet header
> size does not exceed skb->len.
Please generally put a bit more thought into your patches.
> Fixes: e45d8e534b67 ("libertas: add support for Marvell SD8688 chip")
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
I'll also note again that I don't find any tool/LLM disclosure
improbably, nobody really cares about these rivers any more?
> p_rx_pd = (struct rxpd *) skb->data;
> +
> + if (le32_to_cpu(p_rx_pd->pkt_ptr) + sizeof(struct rxpackethdr) >
> + skb->len) {
>
At this point you don't even know yet that the skb is long enough to
access p_r x_pd->pkt_ptr *itself*, so this can't be right.
There's a length check later that checks for
if (skb->len < (ETH_HLEN + 8 + sizeof(struct rxpd))) {
which probably needs to be moved up _and_ improved, but you're not
actually checking things correctly.
How is it that whatever tool you're using to find these isn't
complaining about the fix??
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 13:50 [PATCH v3 0/2] wifi: libertas: firmware trust boundary hardening Tristan Madani
2026-04-21 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] wifi: libertas: fix OOB read from firmware pkt_ptr offset in RX path Tristan Madani
2026-04-22 21:23 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2026-04-21 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] wifi: libertas: fix OOB read from firmware bssdescriptsize in scan response Tristan Madani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12e43b5e8b8db797fa43f4a2cc8b8e5e489c4397.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tristan@talencesecurity.com \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox