linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>,
	Kiran Divekar <dkiran@marvell.com>,
	Yogesh Powar <yogeshp@marvell.com>,
	Marc Yang <yangyang@marvell.com>,
	Frank Huang <frankh@marvell.com>, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] mwifiex: return success in set_default_key for WPA/WPA2
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:53:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302029584.4968.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F704307FA911ED9@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>

Hi,

> > Ok Jouni and I just discussed this briefly, and it looks like there is
> > indeed a special case where the GTK is also set as the default TX key:
> > this case is when the station requested "no pairwise" or when the AP did
> > the same thing in the configuration.
> 
> From the wpa_supplicant debug log generated by Amit, it seems that
> set_default_key() is called while installing PTK to the driver. Is it
> expected?
> 
> WPA: Installing PTK to the driver.
> WPA: RSC - hexdump(len=6): 00 00 00 00 00 00
> wpa_driver_nl80211_set_key: ifindex=12 alg=2 addr=0x80a7168 key_idx=0 set_tx=1 seq_len=6 key_len=32
>    addr=00:1b:2f:55:79:7e
> 
> The complete log file is attached for your reference.

Hmm. I'll need to look at that in more detail. But yeah, set_tx=1
indicates that it'll call set_default_key.

> > Is it possible that this just happens to be the case in your tests? It
> > looks like that would be rather strange, but that's a corner case where
> > the supplicant would possibly set the GTK as the default key.
> 
> Not the same corner case. In our test both pairwise and groupwise are configured.
> 
> > 
> > In any case, this patch seems wrong in that you should never return
> > success if the operation actually failed.
> 
> Could you please advise how we should resolve this?

What happens if you just reject the set_default_key and return -EINVAL
instead of 0?

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-02  1:36 [PATCH 1/2] mwifiex: return success in set_default_key for WPA/WPA2 Bing Zhao
2011-04-02  1:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] mwifiex: remove redundant encryption_mode mapping Bing Zhao
2011-04-03  8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] mwifiex: return success in set_default_key for WPA/WPA2 Johannes Berg
2011-04-03  8:37   ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-05 18:45     ` Bing Zhao
2011-04-05 18:53       ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-04-05 23:22         ` Bing Zhao
2011-04-06  7:08           ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302029584.4968.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
    --cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
    --cc=dkiran@marvell.com \
    --cc=frankh@marvell.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=yangyang@marvell.com \
    --cc=yogeshp@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).