From: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>
To: Roland Vossen <rvossen@broadcom.com>
Cc: "gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: brcm80211: removed #ifdef __mips__
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:49:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303220960.27432.11.camel@maggie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DAD920A.9080500@broadcom.com>
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 15:45 +0200, Roland Vossen wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Greg, please drop this patch set. Rest of this email is FYI only.
>
> Michael:
>
> > Are you sure? __mips__ is automagically defined by GCC, if compiling
> > for MIPS. Maybe it should be converted to some CONFIG_... symbol.
> > But removal seems wrong.
>
> You are right. The majority of the removed #ifdef __mips__ code has to
> do with write flushing. To accomplish this, it performs a R_REG after a
> W_REG. I assumed that writeb() and friends guarantee ordering and write
> flushing, but after some reading I learned that this is not the case.
>
> I will rework the code and submit a new patch set.
>
> For some background info: this patch was a reaction on an email from
> John Linville to us. John wrote:
>
> <quote>
> I took a quick run through a pull of staging from today. I made a few
> notes, but a lot of them would seem to relate to the utils stuff you
> mention above. One general comment would be that there still seems
> to be a lot of MIPS-specific stuff buried in the code, in particular
> a lot of "#ifdef __mips__" stuff that if necessary should at least
> be hidden inside the W_REG macro.
> </quote>
You should probably create a new macro W_REG_FLUSH or something like
that, which enforces ordering by reading back the register, if required.
That avoids ugly #ifdefs in the code.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-19 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 7:13 [PATCH 0/2] staging: brcm80211: removal of obsolete mips code Roland Vossen
2011-04-19 7:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: brcm80211: removed #ifdef __mips__ Roland Vossen
2011-04-19 12:10 ` Michael Büsch
2011-04-19 13:45 ` Roland Vossen
2011-04-19 13:49 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2011-04-19 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-20 7:40 ` Roland Vossen
2011-04-19 7:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: brcm80211: removed BCMFASTPATH macro Roland Vossen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303220960.27432.11.camel@maggie \
--to=m@bues.ch \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).