From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 RFC] mac80211: add ratio to led blinking trigger
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:29:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303673360.3603.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303670920.22777.10.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 11:48 -0700, wwguy wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 11:38 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 10:15 -0700, Wey-Yi Guy wrote:
> > > The current led blink trigger implementaion assume on/off time are equal,
> > > it works but not have any flexbile for different blink pattern.
> > >
> > > Add "ratio" parameter in the trigger table and give driver more control
> > > on how the on/off blink time behavior should be.
> >
> > I considered this when writing the original code, but then decided that
> > nobody needed to have unequal on/off times. Why would we need it now?
> > (FWIW, blink = 0 is always on already, no?)
> >
> But from what I read for iwlwifi, to turn LED_SOLID_ON, on = 11, off =
> 0. Did I read it wrong.
Ah, well, mac80211 has:
/* default to just solid on */
on = 1;
off = 0;
So if you want "solid on" by default for 0 tpt, you simply don't specify
the -1 value, ie. just remove the -1 line from the table completely.
IOW, instead of the patch you posted before, a simple patch just
removing the first line from the table should be sufficient.
> Yes, I agree as today, "on" == "off", just thinking we should make more
> flexible.
I just don't see the point since we don't really need it.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-24 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-24 17:15 [PATCH 1/1 RFC] mac80211: add ratio to led blinking trigger Wey-Yi Guy
2011-04-24 18:38 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-24 18:48 ` wwguy
2011-04-24 19:29 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-04-24 19:37 ` wwguy
2011-04-24 19:44 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-24 19:49 ` wwguy
2011-04-25 7:22 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303673360.3603.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).