From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1288 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755115Ab1EFQKX (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2011 12:10:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] wireless: Make and use const struct ieee80211_channel From: Joe Perches To: "John W. Linville" Cc: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, orinoco-users@lists.sourceforge.net, orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML In-Reply-To: <20110506131922.GA2252@tuxdriver.com> References: <20110505184934.GB3005@tuxdriver.com> <1304634107.1788.171.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20110506131922.GA2252@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 09:10:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1304698221.11874.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> (sfid-20110506_181047_518696_850A0E33) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:19 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:21:47PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:49 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > These patches generated a lot of warnings in net/mac80211. Did you > > > actually build them? > > Yes. > > Did you apply patch 1/2 first? > > It's a dependent patch. > That's the one that cause most of the warnings... Consider the 2 patches as a single patch. Do you have new build warnings after applying both patches 1 and 2?