From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: restrict AP beacon intervals
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 18:49:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304959783.12202.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC81A61.9080101@candelatech.com>
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 09:46 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/09/2011 09:41 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > From: Johannes Berg<johannes.berg@intel.com>
> >
> > Multiple virtual AP interfaces can currently try
> > to use different beacon intervals, but that just
> > leads to problems since it won't actually be done
> > that way by drivers. Return an error in this case
> > to make sure it won't be done wrong.
>
> I think there is no problem with having different beacon
> intervals, as long as they are all a multiple of
> the smallest interval and the driver does things properly.
>
> I'm not sure ath9k or ath5k currently supports this properly,
> but there was a patch floating around for a while that did
> this for ath9k I think...
Yes, in theory that's possible, but apparently no driver actually did
this correctly. Also, it didn't seem like anyone really cares, and we
need to enforce some restrictions because otherwise drivers will end up
doing it wrong, and you'll end up having a beacon interval of 200 while
advertising 150 for example, which will totally throw off powersaving
clients.
If you really care greatly about having different beacon intervals (and
I don't see why you would?) then maybe you can think how we can enforce
and advertise that to userspace. For now, I'm more comfortable just
restricting it.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-09 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-09 16:41 [PATCH] cfg80211: restrict AP beacon intervals Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 16:46 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-09 16:49 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-05-09 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-09 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 17:20 ` Steve Brown
2011-05-09 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-10 20:46 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-11 15:58 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-11 16:48 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-11 17:10 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-11 17:17 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-11 21:39 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-12 8:14 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-12 18:08 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-12 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304959783.12202.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).