From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: "Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: restrict AP beacon intervals
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:17:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305134247.17892.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DCAC2F0.7090308@candelatech.com>
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:10 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 09:48 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:58 +0200, Björn Smedman wrote:
> >
> >>> Yes, in theory that's possible, but apparently no driver actually did
> >>> this correctly. Also, it didn't seem like anyone really cares, and we
> >>> need to enforce some restrictions because otherwise drivers will end up
> >>> doing it wrong, and you'll end up having a beacon interval of 200 while
> >>> advertising 150 for example, which will totally throw off powersaving
> >>> clients.
> >>
> >> I'm very interested in having multiple AP vifs with different beacon
> >> intervals. If we're going to just fail anyway in this case can't we do
> >> that from the drivers instead? I would also prefer that from an
> >> aesthetic point of view, instead of having broken logic in the drivers
> >> "protected" by extra verification in cfg80211.
> >
> > We can't fail from the drivers, they don't have a failure path.
>
> Maybe we could treat the beacon interval setting as a requested
> value, and give the caller some way to know the actual value
> that is used by the hardware?
No, not really, the value needs to be in the beacon data.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-09 16:41 [PATCH] cfg80211: restrict AP beacon intervals Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 16:46 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-09 16:49 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-09 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 17:20 ` Steve Brown
2011-05-09 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-10 20:46 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-11 15:58 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-11 16:48 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-11 17:10 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-11 17:17 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-05-11 21:39 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-12 8:14 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-12 18:08 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-12 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305134247.17892.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).