From: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>,
Kiran Divekar <dkiran@marvell.com>,
Yogesh Powar <yogeshp@marvell.com>,
Marc Yang <yangyang@marvell.com>,
Frank Huang <frankh@marvell.com>, Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] mwifiex: reduce CPU usage by tracking highest_queued_prio
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:17:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305598673-26606-3-git-send-email-bzhao@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305598673-26606-1-git-send-email-bzhao@marvell.com>
From: Marc Yang <yangyang@marvell.com>
This patch adds highest_queued_prio to track priority of packets as
they are enqueued so that mwifiex_wmm_get_highest_priolist_ptr()
starts checking at the first level where we have packets, instead of
the highest. The function also lowers priority value to the level
where first packet is found.
Signed-off-by: Marc Yang <yangyang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
index 537b40d..ea3184d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ struct mwifiex_wmm_desc {
u32 user_pri_pkt_tx_ctrl[WMM_HIGHEST_PRIORITY + 1]; /* UP: 0 to 7 */
/* Number of transmit packets queued */
atomic_t tx_pkts_queued;
+ /* Tracks highest priority with a packet queued */
+ atomic_t highest_queued_prio;
};
struct mwifiex_802_11_security {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c
index 52d2185..f3d5f23 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/wmm.c
@@ -177,14 +177,20 @@ static void mwifiex_wmm_default_queue_priorities(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
* This function map ACs to TIDs.
*/
static void
-mwifiex_wmm_queue_priorities_tid(u8 queue_priority[])
+mwifiex_wmm_queue_priorities_tid(struct mwifiex_wmm_desc *wmm)
{
+ u8 *queue_priority = wmm->queue_priority;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
tos_to_tid[7 - (i * 2)] = ac_to_tid[queue_priority[i]][1];
tos_to_tid[6 - (i * 2)] = ac_to_tid[queue_priority[i]][0];
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_TID; ++i)
+ tos_to_tid_inv[tos_to_tid[i]] = (u8)i;
+
+ atomic_set(&wmm->highest_queued_prio, HIGH_PRIO_TID);
}
/*
@@ -246,7 +252,7 @@ mwifiex_wmm_setup_queue_priorities(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
}
}
- mwifiex_wmm_queue_priorities_tid(priv->wmm.queue_priority);
+ mwifiex_wmm_queue_priorities_tid(&priv->wmm);
}
/*
@@ -401,6 +407,7 @@ mwifiex_wmm_init(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
priv->add_ba_param.rx_win_size = MWIFIEX_AMPDU_DEF_RXWINSIZE;
atomic_set(&priv->wmm.tx_pkts_queued, 0);
+ atomic_set(&priv->wmm.highest_queued_prio, HIGH_PRIO_TID);
}
}
@@ -468,6 +475,7 @@ static void mwifiex_wmm_cleanup_queues(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
ra_list);
atomic_set(&priv->wmm.tx_pkts_queued, 0);
+ atomic_set(&priv->wmm.highest_queued_prio, HIGH_PRIO_TID);
}
/*
@@ -640,6 +648,11 @@ mwifiex_wmm_add_buf_txqueue(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
atomic_inc(&priv->wmm.tx_pkts_queued);
+ if (atomic_read(&priv->wmm.highest_queued_prio) <
+ tos_to_tid_inv[tid_down])
+ atomic_set(&priv->wmm.highest_queued_prio,
+ tos_to_tid_inv[tid_down]);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->wmm.ra_list_spinlock, flags);
}
@@ -865,9 +878,14 @@ mwifiex_wmm_get_highest_priolist_ptr(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
}
do {
+ atomic_t *hqp;
+ spinlock_t *lock;
+
priv_tmp = bssprio_node->priv;
+ hqp = &priv_tmp->wmm.highest_queued_prio;
+ lock = &priv_tmp->wmm.ra_list_spinlock;
- for (i = HIGH_PRIO_TID; i >= LOW_PRIO_TID; --i) {
+ for (i = atomic_read(hqp); i >= LOW_PRIO_TID; --i) {
tid_ptr = &(priv_tmp)->wmm.
tid_tbl_ptr[tos_to_tid[i]];
@@ -905,6 +923,11 @@ mwifiex_wmm_get_highest_priolist_ptr(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
is_list_empty =
skb_queue_empty(&ptr->skb_head);
if (!is_list_empty) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+ if (atomic_read(hqp) > i)
+ atomic_set(hqp, i);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock,
+ flags);
*priv = priv_tmp;
*tid = tos_to_tid[i];
return ptr;
--
1.7.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-17 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 2:17 [PATCH 0/5] mwifiex: CPU mips optimization patch series Bing Zhao
2011-05-17 2:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] mwifiex: reduce CPU usage by tracking tx_pkts_queued Bing Zhao
2011-05-17 2:17 ` Bing Zhao [this message]
2011-05-17 2:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] mwifiex: check mwifiex_wmm_lists_empty() before dequeue Bing Zhao
2011-05-17 2:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] mwifiex: CPU mips optimization with NO_PKT_PRIO_TID Bing Zhao
2011-05-17 2:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] mwifiex: adjust high/low water marks for tx_pending queue Bing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305598673-26606-3-git-send-email-bzhao@marvell.com \
--to=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
--cc=dkiran@marvell.com \
--cc=frankh@marvell.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=yangyang@marvell.com \
--cc=yogeshp@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).