From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@yahoo.com>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: Re: Performance regression between Madwifi/net80211 and ath5k/mac80211
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:50:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308754204.29571.15.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308753669.17439.YahooMailRC@web161208.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 07:41 -0700, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> To answer your actual question: No, there doesn't seem to be a
> difference in CPU usage as shown by top. If anything, madwifi
> seems to use a little bit more:
>
> madwifi: 85,5% idle, 10% si
> ath5k : 89% idle, 10% si
That seems insignificant with so much idle.
> The CPU is:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 13
> model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.00GHz
So it should be a fairly capable system.
I guess you'll need more help from the HW people here.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 20:09 Performance regression between Madwifi/net80211 and ath5k/mac80211 jpo
2011-06-22 2:17 ` Adrian Chadd
2011-06-22 13:41 ` Joerg Pommnitz
2011-06-22 13:46 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-22 14:41 ` Joerg Pommnitz
2011-06-22 14:50 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-06-22 15:02 ` AW: " Joerg Pommnitz
2011-06-22 15:07 ` Joerg Pommnitz
2011-06-22 18:52 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-06-26 14:45 ` [ath5k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2011-06-27 10:26 ` Joerg Pommnitz
2011-06-30 11:02 ` Bob Copeland
2011-10-19 10:06 ` Joerg Pommnitz
2011-10-19 11:33 ` Adrian Chadd
2011-10-19 15:55 ` Pavel Roskin
2011-10-19 18:27 ` Sam Leffler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308754204.29571.15.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pommnitz@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).