linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Cc: ilw@linux.intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.0 regression] DMAR faults in iwlagn
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:54:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308768840.29571.23.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikKia-UXL8LJ60sLDV1uZBFEP8Kwg@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110620_204449_827132_DD43A304)

On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 14:44 -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On 3.0-git today, I get:
> 
> [   40.142872] DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> [   40.142892] DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr ffe38000
> [   40.142896] DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set

Reinette also said she saw this and kindly let me use one of her systems
to track it down.

It looks like this:

iwl_enqueue_hcmd : mapping 1 at ffce2000
dmar_fault : DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [02:00.0] fault addr ffce2000 
DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set

So it's really due to my command changes, and the device is attempting
to write back to at least some commands. I see it doing that for PHY
calibration data, but I think on Reinette's system it was probably for
other commands as well since it happened a lot...

I think we have to map commands BIDI, even if I don't really understand
why.

johannes


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-22 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20 18:44 [3.0 regression] DMAR faults in iwlagn Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-20 19:06 ` wwguy
2011-06-20 19:21   ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-20 19:15     ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-06-21 13:38 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-21 13:55   ` wwguy
2011-06-22 18:54 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-06-22 20:24 ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-22 20:26   ` Johannes Berg
2011-06-24 20:55     ` Kyle McMartin
2011-06-24 15:13   ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-25 13:08     ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1308768840.29571.23.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).