From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: scan behaviour consistency improvements
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:05:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316711112.3698.15.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110921174359.DD2B39D401D@zog.reactivated.net>
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:43 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> When scanning for the broadcast SSID, there is no need to add the
> SSID TLV (restoring the behaviour of the driver behaviour in the wext
> days, confirmed in Marvell specifications).
I reviewed the specs for v9 and v10 and this is correct.
> If bssid is unspecified, the current scan code will usually fire off an
> active scan probing for the specific requested SSID. However, if a scan
> is ongoing (or has just finished), those scan results will be used
> instead (even if that scan is totally different, e.g. a passive scan on
> channel 4 for a different SSID). Fix this inconsistency by always
> firing off a scan when associating without a bssid.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/net/wireless/libertas/dev.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c
> index b456a53..93e5dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cfg.c
> @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static void lbs_scan_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> tlv = scan_cmd->tlvbuffer;
>
> /* add SSID TLV */
> - if (priv->scan_req->n_ssids)
> + if (priv->scan_req->n_ssids && priv->scan_req->ssids[0].ssid_len > 0)
> tlv += lbs_add_ssid_tlv(tlv,
> priv->scan_req->ssids[0].ssid,
> priv->scan_req->ssids[0].ssid_len);
> @@ -732,7 +732,6 @@ static void lbs_scan_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> cfg80211_scan_done(priv->scan_req, false);
>
> priv->scan_req = NULL;
> - priv->last_scan = jiffies;
> }
>
> /* Restart network */
> @@ -1295,24 +1294,26 @@ static int lbs_cfg_connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev,
> lbs_deb_enter(LBS_DEB_CFG80211);
>
> if (!sme->bssid) {
> - /* Run a scan if one isn't in-progress already and if the last
> - * scan was done more than 2 seconds ago.
> - */
> - if (priv->scan_req == NULL &&
> - time_after(jiffies, priv->last_scan + (2 * HZ))) {
> - struct cfg80211_scan_request *creq;
> + struct cfg80211_scan_request *creq;
>
> - creq = _new_connect_scan_req(wiphy, sme);
> - if (!creq) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto done;
> - }
> + /*
> + * Scan for the requested network after waiting for existing
> + * scans to finish.
> + */
> + lbs_deb_assoc("assoc: waiting for existing scans\n");
> + wait_event_interruptible_timeout(priv->scan_q,
> + (priv->scan_req == NULL),
> + (15 * HZ));
>
> - lbs_deb_assoc("assoc: scanning for compatible AP\n");
> - _internal_start_scan(priv, true, creq);
> + creq = _new_connect_scan_req(wiphy, sme);
> + if (!creq) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto done;
> }
>
> - /* Wait for any in-progress scan to complete */
> + lbs_deb_assoc("assoc: scanning for compatible AP\n");
> + _internal_start_scan(priv, true, creq);
> +
> lbs_deb_assoc("assoc: waiting for scan to complete\n");
> wait_event_interruptible_timeout(priv->scan_q,
> (priv->scan_req == NULL),
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/dev.h b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/dev.h
> index adb3490..5ac4d17 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/dev.h
> @@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ struct lbs_private {
> wait_queue_head_t scan_q;
> /* Whether the scan was initiated internally and not by cfg80211 */
> bool internal_scan;
> - unsigned long last_scan;
> };
>
> extern struct cmd_confirm_sleep confirm_sleep;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-22 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-21 17:43 [PATCH] libertas: scan behaviour consistency improvements Daniel Drake
2011-09-22 17:05 ` Dan Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316711112.3698.15.camel@dcbw.foobar.com \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox