From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog120.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.140]:49051 "EHLO na3sys009aog120.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753237Ab1JJS6U (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:58:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ey0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 10so1598816eyd.41 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/29] wl12xx: make event handling support multirole From: Luciano Coelho To: Eliad Peller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1318234397-21081-10-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> References: <1318234397-21081-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1318234397-21081-10-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:58:14 +0300 Message-ID: <1318273094.9690.385.camel@cumari> (sfid-20111010_205824_856634_F4BF0F2B) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 10:12 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote: > Some events don't indicate the role they are intended for. > In these cases, iterate through all the relevant vifs, > and pass the event to each one of them. > > This is only a workaround. future fw releases should indicate > the relevant role_id for such events. > > Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller > --- Is this workaround really necessary? Are we going to have a firmware that supports multi-role but does *not* pass the role_id for these events? -- Cheers, Luca.