From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.151]:59419 "EHLO na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755010Ab1JKSCq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:02:46 -0400 Received: by mail-bw0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 11so10234663bke.6 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC] wl12xx: use the same plat dev name for both SPI and SDIO From: Luciano Coelho To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: balbi@ti.com In-Reply-To: <1317992414-30197-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com> References: <1317992414-30197-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:02:37 +0300 Message-ID: <1318356157.9690.533.camel@cumari> (sfid-20111011_200248_810677_4B9B8511) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:00 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote: > There's no need to have the bus name included in the platform device > name that we create. The core driver doesn't need to know about the > type of bus it uses. Any differences between the buses that need to > be handled differently in the core, can be passed in the platform data > (as the pwr_in_suspend boolean does). > > Use "wl12xx" for the device name in both bus drivers. Rename the > platform driver name to "wl12xx_driver", just to differentiate from > the platform device names. > > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho > --- Nobody complained about this (except Arik, but I answered his question), so I decided to apply this. I won't re-send it as PATCH, because that would be useless. ;) -- Cheers, Luca.