From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:42330 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932517Ab1KDOis (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:38:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mac80211: Support forcing station to disable HT (802.11n). From: Johannes Berg To: Ben Greear Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4EB2CCD7.3010907@candelatech.com> References: <1320299722-30113-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> (sfid-20111103_065534_192366_EF6ABFB6) <1320309465.3950.14.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4EB2CCD7.3010907@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:38:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1320417522.3969.85.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20111104_153851_283067_2DCF3E2D) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:18 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >> --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c > >> +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c > > > > I'd rather split this up into cfg80211/mac80211. In fact, maybe > > splitting it into one cfg80211 and one mac80211 patch, instead of three > > different patches that span both might be worthwhile? > > I really don't care either way. Just let me know how you want it > and I'll split it up thus. Just please do not change your mind later, > splitting patches is nothing but work :P :-) Shouldn't be a lot of work to split along subsystems, though of course API updates would have to be done right away. johannes