linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: "Tomáš Janoušek" <tomi@nomi.cz>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:59:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320854371.13578.26.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111109155411.GA1669@nomi.cz>

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 07:54 -0800, Tomáš Janoušek wrote:
> Hello Stanislaw,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > You may try debugging patches I posted a while ago:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=131914560820378&w=2
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=131914560820293&w=2
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=131914560820317&w=2
> > 
> > With a bit of luck, kernel should panic and dump call-trace when
> > bad code start to write at memory addresses where is not suppose
> > to.
> 
> Thanks for your suggestions. I did as you told me, applied those 3 patches on
> top of 3.1 + net-next (the one from 29 Oct 2011), enabled all those things in
> config and passed corrupt_dbg=1 on cmdline, but the problem happens without
> anything being written to dmesg.
> 
> Am I just lacking a bit of luck, or could it mean something (like that the
> error is in hardware, the microcode, or something like that)?
> 
I am not sure it is uCode related, is there any chance you can bisect
the problem?

we have a major code re-structure around .38/.39 time and not sure it
cause some un-expected problem. 

at the meantime, we will following your instruction and see if we can
re-produce the problem you are seeing

Thanks
Wey



  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-09 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-29 17:15 iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise Tomáš Janoušek
2011-10-31 16:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-09 15:54   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-09 15:59     ` wwguy [this message]
2011-11-09 16:51     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10  9:18       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 11:47         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10 12:53           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 16:07             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10 15:24               ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-10 16:42                 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 17:02                   ` Larry Finger
2011-11-10 16:30               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-11  5:47                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-11 15:01                   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-14 14:07                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-19 18:11                       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-20  2:13                         ` wwguy
2011-11-20  3:20                           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-20  4:28                             ` wwguy
2011-11-20 20:40                               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-10 18:09                                 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-13  9:25                                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-13 13:09                                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-13 13:29                                       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-14  9:20                                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 14:01                                     ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-03-05 14:57                                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 15:00                                         ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-03-05 15:11                                           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 15:18                                             ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-21 13:05                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-21 13:09                           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-21 13:40                             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-21 14:32                               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 19:31         ` Adrian Chadd
2011-11-11  5:44           ` Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1320854371.13578.26.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
    --to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=tomi@nomi.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).