linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tomáš Janoušek" <tomi@nomi.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:24:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320938685.31823.200.camel@wwguy-huron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111110160703.GA2775@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 08:07 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 01:53:47PM +0100, Tomáš Janoušek wrote:
> > > If "dmesg | grep corrupt" will show "Setting corrupt debug order to 1"
> > > patches are in use. Anyway I need to test the patches locally, to see
> > > if they work as expected, perhaps exception is generated but call-trace
> > > is not printed.
> > 
> > It does say that, yes.
> 
> I tested patches. They generate call-trace and make kernel panic when I
> wrote at random address from user address space. However to make kernel
> panic, we should keep as much as possible free memory, otherwise bad code
> corrupt not-protected data. In other words, when you run memory intensive
> application, corruption may happen on valid data.  So to catch the bug,
> you should just use network, and perhaps stress up cpu i.e: by this bash
> command:
> 
> while true; do : ; done 
> 
> Please also configure CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX=y, it protect modules
> text/read-only memory against corruption.
> 
> > > Is this happen only with "Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6205" or
> > > with some other adapters?
> > 
> > I don't have any other iwlwifi adapters, so I wouldn't know. The people in
> > that Ubuntu bugreport have exactly that card as well, but in another notebook.
> > And they claim it works in newer Ubuntu, but I am running latest kernels with
> > latest uCode, so I'm out of ideas what else could be wrong.
> 
> That's good hint for Intel folks. Would be ideal if any developer could
> reproduce that. I do not have this exact adapter model.
> 
> > > > Perhaps it would be cheaper to just get another card in that case.
> > > > :-)
> > >
> > > That will left issue unresolved :-(
> > 
> > Yeah, but considering how few people report this, I'm starting to feel that it
> > might in fact be a hardware issue.
> 
> It's possible, but I don think so. In my practice, majority of corruption
> problems was caused by software. All true hardware corruptions I meet, was on
> development boards, many months before they went into production.
> 
> > (We've got a lot of Lenovos here, mostly T520 and T420s, most of them running
> > Fedora, and nobody has reported memory corruption problems.
> 
> Are there any others with 6205? If not that would confirm issue is
> related with that model.

We try very hard on 6205 but can not reproduce this issue, I agree with
Stanislaw the memory corruption is most likely a sw problem.
1. please try older kernel, and possible bisect the kernel
2. could you provide your system information (model, CPU, memory,
graphic, ...), also the OS/kernel version and .config file. not sure we
have the similar system available, but I will like to see if there
anything stand out.

Thanks
Wey

> 
> > Perhaps I should try to connect to this WPA Enterprise using Windows and see
> > if anything goes wrong. However, I have no clue as to what shall I do to
> > reproduce the issue in Windows.)
> 
> You may first try some older kernel as Wey suggested, i.e. 2.6.38.
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-10 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-29 17:15 iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise Tomáš Janoušek
2011-10-31 16:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-09 15:54   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-09 15:59     ` wwguy
2011-11-09 16:51     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10  9:18       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 11:47         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10 12:53           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 16:07             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10 15:24               ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2011-11-10 16:42                 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 17:02                   ` Larry Finger
2011-11-10 16:30               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-11  5:47                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-11 15:01                   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-14 14:07                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-19 18:11                       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-20  2:13                         ` wwguy
2011-11-20  3:20                           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-20  4:28                             ` wwguy
2011-11-20 20:40                               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-10 18:09                                 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-13  9:25                                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-13 13:09                                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-13 13:29                                       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-14  9:20                                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 14:01                                     ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-03-05 14:57                                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 15:00                                         ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-03-05 15:11                                           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 15:18                                             ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-21 13:05                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-21 13:09                           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-21 13:40                             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-21 14:32                               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 19:31         ` Adrian Chadd
2011-11-11  5:44           ` Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1320938685.31823.200.camel@wwguy-huron \
    --to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=tomi@nomi.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).