From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.1+ iwlwifi lockup
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:56:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322016965.11647.95.camel@wwguy-huron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111123033446.GB9703@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 19:34 -0800, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 06:29:40PM -0800, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 18:45 -0800, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:15:02PM -0800, wwguy wrote:
> > > > Hi Dave,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for taking so long.
> > > > it is a bogus command from the firmware which driver try to process it
> > > > and cause problem. I am not sure how it happen. But could you please try
> > > > the patch I attach here.
> > > >
> > > > For now I am just ignore the command, but not sure it is good enough,
> > > > might has to reload the firmware, but not sure.
> > >
> > > With Linus' current tree and this patch, I got a panic pretty quickly,
> > > but with a different trace.
> > >
> > Are you seeing the problem without this patch? I guess the patch I done
> > here is not the right thing to do and I try to address the problem too
> > aggressively
>
> I've been running Linus' current tree for the whole time and haven't seen
> any iwlwifi traces since my initial report on the 11th.
>
> I can't reproduce the bug, even by doing the same operation
> (an scp of a dozen photographs).
>
> It seems to happen almost at random, as if it's somehow timing related.
> I'm running the patched kernel again now, and it's been fine for the last hour.
>
Agree, that is why I could not re-produce here after many try. Could you
share your configuration, such as band/channel, 32/64 bit system, 20/40
MHz, traffic type, open/security, power management, ...,
Thanks
Wey
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 14:34 3.1+ iwlwifi lockup Dave Jones
2011-10-31 15:44 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-01 20:27 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-01 22:08 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-26 2:22 ` Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
2011-11-22 20:15 ` wwguy
2011-11-22 20:47 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-22 19:58 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-22 22:54 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-22 22:49 ` wwguy
2011-11-23 2:45 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-23 2:29 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-23 3:34 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-23 2:56 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2011-11-23 4:17 ` Dave Jones
2011-11-24 15:00 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-25 12:11 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-22 20:16 ` wwguy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322016965.11647.95.camel@wwguy-huron \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).