From: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] iwlwifi: always check if got h/w access before write
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:13:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328544791.14547.12.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328544564-8696-2-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:09 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Before we write to the device registers always check if
> iwl_grap_nic_access() was successful.
>
> On the way change return type of grab_nic_access() to bool, and add
> likely()/unlikely() statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.c | 52 +++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-mac80211.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie-rx.c | 4 +-
> 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tt.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tt.c
> index 56c6def..e9a0e93 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tt.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void iwl_tt_check_exit_ct_kill(unsigned long data)
> }
> iwl_read32(bus(priv), CSR_UCODE_DRV_GP1);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus(priv)->reg_lock, flags);
> - if (!iwl_grab_nic_access(bus(priv)))
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus(priv))))
> iwl_release_nic_access(bus(priv));
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus(priv)->reg_lock, flags);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
> index 90315c6..2642bf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static void iwl_print_cont_event_trace(struct iwl_priv *priv, u32 base,
>
> /* Make sure device is powered up for SRAM reads */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus(priv)->reg_lock, reg_flags);
> - if (iwl_grab_nic_access(bus(priv))) {
> + if (unlikely(!iwl_grab_nic_access(bus(priv)))) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus(priv)->reg_lock, reg_flags);
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.c
> index ce6d9c1..b5d0bcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.c
> @@ -117,16 +117,17 @@ int iwl_grab_nic_access_silent(struct iwl_bus *bus)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int iwl_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_bus *bus)
> +bool iwl_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_bus *bus)
> {
> int ret = iwl_grab_nic_access_silent(bus);
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> u32 val = iwl_read32(bus, CSR_GP_CNTRL);
> WARN_ONCE(1, "Timeout waiting for ucode processor access "
> "(CSR_GP_CNTRL 0x%08x)\n", val);
> + return false;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return true;
> }
>
> void iwl_release_nic_access(struct iwl_bus *bus)
> @@ -155,7 +156,7 @@ void iwl_write_direct32(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 reg, u32 value)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - if (!iwl_grab_nic_access(bus)) {
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> iwl_write32(bus, reg, value);
> iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> }
> @@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ void iwl_write_prph(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 addr, u32 val)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - if (!iwl_grab_nic_access(bus)) {
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> __iwl_write_prph(bus, addr, val);
> iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> }
> @@ -222,9 +223,10 @@ void iwl_set_bits_prph(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 reg, u32 mask)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - iwl_grab_nic_access(bus);
> - __iwl_write_prph(bus, reg, __iwl_read_prph(bus, reg) | mask);
> - iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> + __iwl_write_prph(bus, reg, __iwl_read_prph(bus, reg) | mask);
> + iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -234,10 +236,11 @@ void iwl_set_bits_mask_prph(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 reg,
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - iwl_grab_nic_access(bus);
> - __iwl_write_prph(bus, reg,
> - (__iwl_read_prph(bus, reg) & mask) | bits);
> - iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> + __iwl_write_prph(bus, reg,
> + (__iwl_read_prph(bus, reg) & mask) | bits);
> + iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -247,10 +250,11 @@ void iwl_clear_bits_prph(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 reg, u32 mask)
> u32 val;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - iwl_grab_nic_access(bus);
> - val = __iwl_read_prph(bus, reg);
> - __iwl_write_prph(bus, reg, (val & ~mask));
> - iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> + val = __iwl_read_prph(bus, reg);
> + __iwl_write_prph(bus, reg, (val & ~mask));
> + iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -262,15 +266,13 @@ void _iwl_read_targ_mem_words(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 addr,
> u32 *vals = buf;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - iwl_grab_nic_access(bus);
> -
> - iwl_write32(bus, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR, addr);
> - rmb();
> -
> - for (offs = 0; offs < words; offs++)
> - vals[offs] = iwl_read32(bus, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
> -
> - iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> + iwl_write32(bus, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RADDR, addr);
> + rmb();
> + for (offs = 0; offs < words; offs++)
> + vals[offs] = iwl_read32(bus, HBUS_TARG_MEM_RDAT);
> + iwl_release_nic_access(bus);
> + }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -291,7 +293,7 @@ int _iwl_write_targ_mem_words(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 addr,
> u32 *vals = buf;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->reg_lock, flags);
> - if (!iwl_grab_nic_access(bus)) {
> + if (likely(iwl_grab_nic_access(bus))) {
> iwl_write32(bus, HBUS_TARG_MEM_WADDR, addr);
> wmb();
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.h
> index 427d065..f4763d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ int iwl_poll_direct_bit(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 addr, u32 mask,
> int timeout);
>
> int iwl_grab_nic_access_silent(struct iwl_bus *bus);
> -int iwl_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_bus *bus);
> +bool iwl_grab_nic_access(struct iwl_bus *bus);
> void iwl_release_nic_access(struct iwl_bus *bus);
>
> u32 iwl_read_direct32(struct iwl_bus *bus, u32 reg);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-mac80211.c
> index 965d047..218071a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-mac80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-mac80211.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int iwlagn_mac_resume(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> if (iwlagn_hw_valid_rtc_data_addr(base)) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bus(priv)->reg_lock, flags);
> ret = iwl_grab_nic_access_silent(bus(priv));
> - if (ret == 0) {
> + if (likely(ret == 0)) {
you change the return to bool, right, but "ret" is "int"
Wey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 16:09 [RFC 1/4] iwlwifi: dump stack when fail to gain access to the device Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-06 16:08 ` wwguy
2012-02-07 8:01 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-07 14:21 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2012-02-08 10:52 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-06 16:09 ` [RFC 2/4] iwlwifi: always check if got h/w access before write Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-06 16:13 ` wwguy [this message]
2012-02-07 8:05 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-07 14:20 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2012-02-06 16:09 ` [RFC 3/4] iwlwifi: cleanup/fix memory barriers Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-06 16:13 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-07 8:11 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-07 8:25 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-06 16:09 ` [RFC 4/4] iwlwifi: use writeb,writel,readl directly Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-06 16:32 ` wwguy
2012-02-07 8:22 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-07 14:22 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2012-02-10 12:01 ` [RFC 1/4] iwlwifi: dump stack when fail to gain access to the device Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-23 10:14 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328544791.14547.12.camel@wwguy-ubuntu \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).