Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] wifi: ath10k: snoc: support powering on the device via pwrseq

[Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 1/15/2026 11:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/01/2026 23:30, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 1/5/2026 5:01 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> The WCN39xx family of WiFi/BT chips incorporates a simple PMU, spreading
>>> voltages over internal rails. Implement support for using powersequencer
>>> for this family of ATH10k devices in addition to using regulators.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.h |  2 ++
>>
>> My automation flagged:
>> * drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c has no QTI copyright
>> * drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.h has no QTI copyright
>> * 2 copyright issues
>>
>> I'll add these manually in my 'pending' branch
>>
> 
> And why is this a problem? You are not here to impose Qualcomm rules, bu
> care about Linux kernel. You cannot add copyrights based on what exactly?

I am a maintainer that is paid by Qualcomm to perform that role, and hence I
have a duty to enforce the legal guidance from Qualcomm when it comes to
contributions from other Qualcomm employees.

/jeff