linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: remove channel type argument from rate_update
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:46:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1333089999.3908.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20341.14488.303053.16407@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:07 +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> > 
> > The channel type argument to the rate_update()
> > callback isn't really the correct way to give
> > the rate control algorithm about the desired
> > RX bandwidth of the peer.
> > 
> > Remove this argument, and instead update the
> > STA capabilities with 20/40 appropriately. The
> > SMPS update done by this callback works in the
> > same way, so this makes the callback cleaner.
> 
> I think that the HT capabilities cannot be changed dynamically.
> The HT operating parameters along with ChannelSwitch frames are used to
> notify bandwidth changes. Or that is my understanding of 11.14.4.2.

Yes, that's true. However, we use the sta.ht_cap field more of a current
operating set database. For example, we also update it when the station
changes SMPS configuration. Also, we never keep it at just the station's
capabilities -- we always restrict it by our own TX capabilities (so if
for example we aren't 40 MHz capable, we already don't leave 40 MHz in).

Overall, I don't really see a problem with this. I suppose we could
rename the field to make that a bit clearer, but I see little value in
using some other struct or so?

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-30  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-28  8:58 [PATCH 0/4] early HT channel setting Johannes Berg
2012-03-28  8:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] mac80211: set HT channel before association Johannes Berg
2012-03-28  8:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] mac80211: remove channel type argument from rate_update Johannes Berg
2012-03-30  4:37   ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-03-30  6:46     ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-03-30  7:12       ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-03-28  8:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] mac80211: remove queue stop on rate control update Johannes Berg
2012-03-28  8:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] mac80211: notify driver of rate control updates Johannes Berg
2012-03-29 19:13   ` Eliad Peller
2012-03-29 19:14     ` Johannes Berg
2012-03-30  6:43   ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] " Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1333089999.3908.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).