From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>,
Ilan Elias <ilane@ti.com>,
Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@linux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/18] NFC: The core part should generate the target index
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:43:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334079800-10671-8-git-send-email-sameo@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334079800-10671-1-git-send-email-sameo@linux.intel.com>
The target index can be used by userspace to uniquely identify a target
and thus should be kept unique, per NFC adapter. Moreover, some protocols
do not provide a logical index when discovering new targets, so we have to
generate one for them.
For NCI or pn533 to fetch their logical index, we added a logical_idx field
to the target structure.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
---
include/net/nfc/nfc.h | 2 ++
net/nfc/core.c | 5 +++++
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 2 +-
net/nfc/nci/ntf.c | 11 ++++++-----
net/nfc/rawsock.c | 6 ++++++
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
index 431a6c5..45f0563 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct nfc_target {
u8 sensf_res_len;
u8 sensf_res[NFC_SENSF_RES_MAXSIZE];
u8 hci_reader_gate;
+ u8 logical_idx;
};
struct nfc_genl_data {
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ struct nfc_genl_data {
struct nfc_dev {
unsigned idx;
+ unsigned target_idx;
struct nfc_target *targets;
int n_targets;
int targets_generation;
diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c
index deb4721..d924000 100644
--- a/net/nfc/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/core.c
@@ -428,10 +428,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nfc_alloc_recv_skb);
int nfc_targets_found(struct nfc_dev *dev,
struct nfc_target *targets, int n_targets)
{
+ int i;
+
pr_debug("dev_name=%s n_targets=%d\n", dev_name(&dev->dev), n_targets);
dev->polling = false;
+ for (i = 0; i < n_targets; i++)
+ targets[i].idx = dev->target_idx++;
+
spin_lock_bh(&dev->targets_lock);
dev->targets_generation++;
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
index 9ec065b..8737c20 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int nci_activate_target(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev, __u32 target_idx,
}
if (atomic_read(&ndev->state) == NCI_W4_HOST_SELECT) {
- param.rf_discovery_id = target->idx;
+ param.rf_discovery_id = target->logical_idx;
if (protocol == NFC_PROTO_JEWEL)
param.rf_protocol = NCI_RF_PROTOCOL_T1T;
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
index 2e3dee4..99e1632 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void nci_add_new_target(struct nci_dev *ndev,
for (i = 0; i < ndev->n_targets; i++) {
target = &ndev->targets[i];
- if (target->idx == ntf->rf_discovery_id) {
+ if (target->logical_idx == ntf->rf_discovery_id) {
/* This target already exists, add the new protocol */
nci_add_new_protocol(ndev, target, ntf->rf_protocol,
ntf->rf_tech_and_mode,
@@ -248,10 +248,10 @@ static void nci_add_new_target(struct nci_dev *ndev,
ntf->rf_tech_and_mode,
&ntf->rf_tech_specific_params);
if (!rc) {
- target->idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
+ target->logical_idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
ndev->n_targets++;
- pr_debug("target_idx %d, n_targets %d\n", target->idx,
+ pr_debug("logical idx %d, n_targets %d\n", target->logical_idx,
ndev->n_targets);
}
}
@@ -372,10 +372,11 @@ static void nci_target_auto_activated(struct nci_dev *ndev,
if (rc)
return;
- target->idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
+ target->logical_idx = ntf->rf_discovery_id;
ndev->n_targets++;
- pr_debug("target_idx %d, n_targets %d\n", target->idx, ndev->n_targets);
+ pr_debug("logical idx %d, n_targets %d\n",
+ target->logical_idx, ndev->n_targets);
nfc_targets_found(ndev->nfc_dev, ndev->targets, ndev->n_targets);
}
diff --git a/net/nfc/rawsock.c b/net/nfc/rawsock.c
index 5a839ce..b2825aa 100644
--- a/net/nfc/rawsock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/rawsock.c
@@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ static int rawsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *_addr,
goto error;
}
+ if (addr->target_idx > dev->target_idx - 1 ||
+ addr->target_idx < dev->target_idx - dev->n_targets) {
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
rc = nfc_activate_target(dev, addr->target_idx, addr->nfc_protocol);
if (rc)
goto put_dev;
--
1.7.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 17:43 [PATCH 00/18] NFC changes for 3.5 Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 01/18 3.4] NFC: Fix the LLCP Tx fragmentation loop Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 02/18] NFC: Add a target lost netlink event Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 03/18] NFC: Export target lost function Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 04/18] NFC: HCI support Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 05/18] NFC: SHDLC implementation Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 06/18] NFC: Add HCI documentation Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 08/18] NFC: Fix next target_idx type and rename for clarity Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 09/18] NFC: Changed target activated state logic Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 10/18] NFC: Add Core support to generate tag lost event Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 11/18] NFC: Dump LLCP frames Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 12/18] NFC: No need to apply twice the modulo op to LLCP's recv_n Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 13/18] NFC: Fix LLCP TLV building routine Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 14/18] NFC: Call llcp_add_header properly when sending LLCP DM or DISC Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 15/18] NFC: Convert pn533 from tasklet to workqueues Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 16/18] NFC: pn533 Rx chaining support Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 17/18] NFC: Add MIUX to the local LLCP general bytes Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 18/18] NFC: Fix LLCP link timeout typo Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334079800-10671-8-git-send-email-sameo@linux.intel.com \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org \
--cc=eric.lapuyade@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilane@ti.com \
--cc=lauro.venancio@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).