From: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>, Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>,
"bartosz.markowski" <bartosz.markowski@tieto.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] wlcore: fixes for connection_loss_work
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:08:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337090940-13750-4-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337090940-13750-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com>
We can't use cancel_delayed_work_sync() from functions that take the
wl->mutex, since connection_loss_work also takes the mutex. This might
result in a deadlock. Restructure the code so the work is synchronously
canceled before taking the mutex.
Avoid a bug where we would indefinitely delay the connection loss
indication by re-queuing the connection loss work on consecutive beacon
loss events.
Cc: bartosz.markowski <bartosz.markowski@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/event.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/event.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/event.c
index 28e2a63..4ed83579 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/event.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/event.c
@@ -148,15 +148,24 @@ static int wl1271_event_process(struct wl1271 *wl)
int delay = wl->conf.conn.synch_fail_thold *
wl->conf.conn.bss_lose_timeout;
wl1271_info("Beacon loss detected.");
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wl->connection_loss_work);
+
+ /*
+ * if the work is already queued, it should take place. We
+ * don't want to delay the connection loss indication
+ * any more.
+ */
ieee80211_queue_delayed_work(wl->hw, &wl->connection_loss_work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
+ msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
}
if (vector & REGAINED_BSS_EVENT_ID) {
/* TODO: check for multi-role */
wl1271_info("Beacon regained.");
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wl->connection_loss_work);
+ cancel_delayed_work(&wl->connection_loss_work);
+
+ /* sanity check - we can't lose and gain the beacon together */
+ WARN(vector & BSS_LOSE_EVENT_ID,
+ "Concurrent beacon loss and gain from FW");
}
if (vector & RSSI_SNR_TRIGGER_0_EVENT_ID) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
index 659634b..35f6bc1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
@@ -3708,9 +3708,6 @@ sta_not_found:
do_join = true;
set_assoc = true;
- /* Cancel connection_loss_work */
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wl->connection_loss_work);
-
/*
* use basic rates from AP, and determine lowest rate
* to use with control frames.
@@ -3960,6 +3957,13 @@ static void wl1271_op_bss_info_changed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
wl1271_debug(DEBUG_MAC80211, "mac80211 bss info changed 0x%x",
(int)changed);
+ /*
+ * make sure to cancel pending disconnections if our association
+ * state changed
+ */
+ if (!is_ap && (changed & BSS_CHANGED_ASSOC))
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wl->connection_loss_work);
+
mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
if (unlikely(wl->state == WL1271_STATE_OFF))
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-15 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 14:08 [PATCH 01/10] wlcore: fix sparse warnings related to static functions Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] wlcore: use the original elp time in forced_ps mode Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] wlcore: fix dynamic_ps_timeout time regression Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` Arik Nemtsov [this message]
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 05/10] wlcore: use correct link for bcast/multicast frames Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 06/10] wlcore: flush before stopping AP Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 07/10] wlcore: modify bss loss parameters Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] wlcore: increase number of BA sessions to 3 Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 09/10] wl18xx: add dependency on mac80211 Arik Nemtsov
2012-05-15 14:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] wlcore: set wl->ht_cap per-band Arik Nemtsov
2012-06-05 14:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] wlcore: fix sparse warnings related to static functions Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337090940-13750-4-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com \
--to=arik@wizery.com \
--cc=bartosz.markowski@tieto.com \
--cc=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).