From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/14] cfg80211: track monitor interfaces count
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338983581.26346.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FCF41AA.9070400@tieto.com>
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 13:40 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > The other thing we might then want to is make this more general and not
> > just inform the driver about the monitor/no-monitor layout change, but
> > also tell it which interface combination we're in right now? Might look
> > a bit more like
> >
> > set_iface_combination(wiphy, dev, combination);
> >
> > or even
> > set_iface_combination(wiphy, dev, combination, have_monitor);
> >
> >
> > Then pure monitor would be "combination == NULL, have_monitor=True",
> > etc. The only downside is that we don't have combinations advertised for
> > when there's a single interface only, so we'd have to point to some
> > internal single-interface combinations then (static in cfg80211).
> > Thoughts?
>
> I'm afraid we can't simply tell which combination we're in. I imagine
> there may be two or three combinations matching at the same time. Take
> this for example:
>
> comb1: 1xSTA + 1xAP (max channels = 1)
> comb2: 2xSTA (max channels = 2)
>
> wlan0 is running as STA @ chan=1
>
> Which combination are we in? Which one should we report to the driver?
Doesn't matter, right? Pick the one with most channels or something? :-)
> I don't see what passing current interface combination would be useful
> for. Do you have something particular in mind?
I'm thinking about # of channels in the combination mostly, in
particular in combination with IBSS. OTOH, if we always reserve one
channel for IBSS in cfg80211 (unless it's fixed & driver supports that)
then it won't matter.
But then again, what about say 2xSTA being active and drivers with
connect() API?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-28 11:18 [RFC] multi-channel work Michal Kazior
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 01/14] cfg80211: respect intf combinations for 1 interface Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:51 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-06 8:56 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 9:02 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 02/14] cfg80211: check iface combinations only when intf is running Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:52 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 03/14] cfg80211: introduce cfg80211_stop_ap Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:54 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 04/14] cfg80211: .stop_ap when interface is going down Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:54 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 05/14] cfg80211: add channel tracking for AP and mesh Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:55 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 06/14] cfg80211: introduce cfg80211_get_used_channel Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:57 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 07/14] cfg80211: track monitor interfaces count Michal Kazior
2012-05-29 14:13 ` Eliad Peller
2012-06-06 9:10 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-06 11:40 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 11:53 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-06-07 2:46 ` Bing Zhao
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 08/14] mac80211: refactor virtual monitor code Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 8:58 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-06 8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-06 9:11 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 09/14] cfg80211: refuse to .set_monitor_channel when non-monitors are present Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 9:11 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 10/14] cfg80211: track monitor channel Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 9:13 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:18 ` [RFC 11/14] cfg80211/mac80211: remove .get_channel Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 9:14 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:19 ` [RFC 12/14] cfg80211: move devlist locking out of can_change_interface Michal Kazior
2012-05-28 11:19 ` [RFC 13/14] cfg80211: extend combination checking to consider channels Michal Kazior
2012-05-29 14:21 ` Eliad Peller
2012-06-06 9:18 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-28 11:19 ` [RFC 14/14] cfg80211: respect iface combinations when starting operation Michal Kazior
2012-05-29 14:52 ` Eliad Peller
2012-06-06 9:20 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-29 7:04 ` [RFC] multi-channel work Johannes Berg
2012-05-29 7:09 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-06 9:22 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338983581.26346.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=kvalo@adurom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).