From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3] initial channel context implementation
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:31:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340868682.4491.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FEBF3D4.3030705@tieto.com>
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 08:04 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> > In any case, I think you're turning it upside down. I think we should
> > get rid of local->oper_channel(_type) completely, and instead use the
> > channel contexts in mac80211 everywhere. If the driver doesn't implement
> > channel contexts it can only support a single channel. Thus, we can have
> > at most one channel context, so whenever a new context is added (there
> > could be zero) or any context is modified (the only one) we can set
> > hw.conf.channel and call hw_config() with the CHANNEL_CHANGE flag.
> >
> > IOW, nothing in mac80211 would ever call hw_config() for the channel or
> > channel type change, it would all do channel contexts, but the channel
> > context code would see that if the driver doesn't support channel
> > contexts
> > 1) there will be at most one context in mac80211
> > 2) this context is programmed into the device by using hw_config()
> > instead of the context callbacks
>
> Yes, this is more or less what I also had in mind. I was just thinking
> about solving the issue of channel context and hw.conf.channel
> consistency. If we switch a channel we either modify channel in channel
> context directly (violating the immutability of channel contexts) or we
> iterate and re-set the new channel on each interface (because
> single-channel drivers may still have multiple interfaces and we
> probably want to use sdata->vif.chanctx_conf->channel instead of
> hw.conf.channel inside mac80211).
>
> Now that I think about it I guess violating the immutability for the
> single-channel case is okay. It would greatly simplify the code and we'd
> just put a comment down in hw_config where the only violation would occur.
I'm not sure why we would violate it? The way I see it, you'd never
change the channel context channel since internally in mac80211 you'd
never want to see a different channel, just like today we use
local->oper_channel everywhere we'd then use sdata->vif.chanctx->channel
throughout, right?
I think the only thing we need to do is put something like this into
hw_config:
if (local->tmp_channel) {
local->hw.conf.channel = local->tmp_channel;
...
} else {
local->hw.conf.channel = chanctx->channel;
}
No?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-28 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-26 12:37 [RFC v3] initial channel context implementation Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 1/7] mac80211: introduce channel context skeleton code Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 2/7] mac80211: introduce new ieee80211_ops Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 3/7] mac80211: add drv_* wrappers for channel contexts Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 4/7] mac80211: add chanctx tracing Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 5/7] mac80211: use channel context notifications Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 13:35 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-26 14:01 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 15:34 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 6/7] mac80211: refactor set_channel_type Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 14:04 ` Eliad Peller
2012-06-26 12:37 ` [RFC v3 7/7] mac80211: reuse channels for channel contexts Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 13:41 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-26 13:55 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-26 15:34 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-26 13:43 ` [RFC v3] initial channel context implementation Johannes Berg
2012-06-27 7:30 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-27 8:10 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-27 10:13 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-27 11:10 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-27 12:43 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-27 14:02 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-28 6:04 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-28 7:31 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-06-28 7:54 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-28 8:13 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-28 9:20 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-28 9:27 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-28 9:47 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-28 7:01 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-28 8:15 ` Johannes Berg
2012-06-28 8:54 ` Michal Kazior
2012-06-28 9:27 ` Johannes Berg
2012-07-25 10:22 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340868682.4491.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).