Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: support TX error rate CQM

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:20 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
> Let the user configure serveral TX error conection quality monitoring
> parameters: % error rate, survey interval, and # of attempted packets.
> 
> On exceeding the TX failure rate over the given interval, the driver
> will send a CQM notify event with the actual TX failure rate and
> packets attempted.

It seems useful to me to also send the interval, in case somebody else
is listening to the events or in case the interval was changed, etc.?


> + * @NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_RATE: TX error rate in %. Minimum % of TX failures
> + *	during the given %NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_INTVL before an
> + *	%NL80211_CMD_NOTIFY_CQM with reported %NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_RATE and
> + *	%NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_PKTS is generated.

Is percentage fine-grained enough? I guess it is?

> + * @NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_PKTS: number of TX attempts in a given
> + *	%NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_INTVL before %NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_RATE is
> + *	checked.

I'm not sure I'd say "TX attempts", that gets confusing, do you count
retries? I guess not. Maybe say "attempted packets" or something else
that includes TX too?

> + * @NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_INTVL: interval in seconds. Specifies the periodic
> + *	interval in which %NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_PKTS and
> + *	%NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_RATE must be satisfied before generating an
> + *	%NL80211_CMD_NOTIFY_CQM.

Should there be some ... sanity checking? Like ... can't set it to more
than, say, half an hour?


> +	} else if (attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_RATE] &&
> +		   attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_PKTS] &&
> +		   attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_INTVL]) {
> +		u32 rate, pkts, intvl;
> +		rate = nla_get_u32(attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_RATE]);
> +		pkts = nla_get_u32(attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_PKTS]);
> +		intvl = nla_get_u32(attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CQM_TXE_INTVL]);
> +		err = nl80211_set_cqm_txe(info, rate, pkts, intvl);

You should probably check things here ... e.g. the percentage can't be
>100? :-)
Also it seems like there should be some way to *disable* it again that
you should document?

johannes