From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
liang.li@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Fix inability to configure adhoc in 3.4.x
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343838717.4638.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343837663-12645-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> (sfid-20120801_181448_175333_E1A6DA81)
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 12:14 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[...]
> However, things still weren't right unless he also cherry picked the
> 8e8b41f9d8c8e6 ("cfg80211: enforce lack of interface combinations")
> to get the later mentioned "total == 1" check within, so that we
> avoid the EBUSY above. But this commit causes other regressions
> (as described in the commit log of the attached patch) so we didn't
> think it best to go that route for 3.4.x.
>
> So, the options we considered (to fix 3.4.x stable) were:
>
> 1) cherry pick 8e8b41f9d, and all the driver specific changes it requires
>
> 2) make a sub-commit for stable that just takes the total==1 from #1.
>
> 3) patch iwlwifi/iwl-mac80211.c and add ".types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)"
>
> 4) treat ADHOC as a universal feature that everyone has.
>
> The following patch does #4, and in theory it could be used in mainline
> and then cherry picked back to stable. But we weren't 100% sure if that
> was the best solution, since neither of us are really wireless people,
> hence all the detail here.
Thanks for the detailed analysis. Given 8e8b41f9d, I don't think any
mainline changes are actually needed?
I don't think #4 is right, not all drivers do in fact support IBSS.
Making them advertise it will just cause issues.
I think #2 would be the best option.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-01 16:14 [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Fix inability to configure adhoc in 3.4.x Paul Gortmaker
2012-08-01 16:14 ` [PATCH] cfg80211: fix combination check for ADHOC Paul Gortmaker
2012-08-01 16:31 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-08-01 17:38 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Fix inability to configure adhoc in 3.4.x Paul Gortmaker
2012-08-01 17:42 ` Johannes Berg
2012-08-01 17:58 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-08-02 22:55 ` [PATCH stable] cfg80211: fix interface combinations check for ADHOC(IBSS) Paul Gortmaker
2012-08-06 1:00 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-13 18:59 ` Patch "cfg80211: fix interface combinations check for ADHOC(IBSS)" has been added to the 3.4-stable tree gregkh
2012-08-13 19:00 ` Patch "cfg80211: fix interface combinations check for ADHOC(IBSS)" has been added to the 3.0-stable tree gregkh
2012-08-02 2:53 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Fix inability to configure adhoc in 3.4.x Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343838717.4638.9.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=liang.li@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).