From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:55023 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759048Ab2HXRgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:36:18 -0400 Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14so1200637wib.1 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1345829949.1460.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (sfid-20120824_193622_464995_2E8DD5FD) Subject: Re: [BUG] brcmsmac: Invalid killswitch handling From: Sebastian Poehn To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Arend van Spriel Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:39:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <50375E8F.6010302@broadcom.com> References: <1345798314.1478.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <50375E8F.6010302@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 12:59 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > brcmsmac handled the rfkill switch properly so this would be a > regression. I also have Dell laptops here with a physical rfkill switch. > What rfkill switch do you have? I have no idea how to detect the type of the switch (looks like it's neither connected via usb nor pci). That's what rfkill tells me: [sebastian@localhost ~]$ rfkill list 0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes 1: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no It is a Vostro 3300 with a physical slide switch on the front being either black and enabled or red and disabled. > > Anyway, I will test over here on my hardware as this regression has been > flagged internally here as well. Would you be willing to test a fix on > your system when I have one? Would be a joy for me