From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] p54: connect to 11w protected networks
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346769429.3737.30.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346769184.26638.7.camel@dcbw.foobar.com>
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:33 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 16:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 15:19 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> >
> > > As you feared: the firmware is corrupting incoming management
> > > frames. However, it does so only when a rxkey was configured.
> > > So as a possible trade-off, MFP will only be supported by p54,
> > > when the firmware crypto offloading is relieved of his duties
> > > (disabled).
> > >
> > > Note: Strictly speaking, it would be enough to no longer upload
> > > any rx key which could affect management frames, as the firmware
> > > does not decrypt any frames unless there is a fitting key candidate.
> >
> > Right, however, that would kinda defeat the point. Unless ... maybe we
> > can tell the driver if 11w is going to be used at all? If we did that,
> > we could make it work in the set_key callback.
> >
> > For now your patch looks good though.
>
> We can't get this to happen without a module option? Is there a way to
> turn the crypto offloading off when we know we're connecting to a W
> protected AP?
Yeah that's what I was thinking. I suppose we *could* somehow do this by
setting some key flag in mac80211 that the driver can check.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-02 13:22 [PATCH] p54: connect to 11w protected networks Christian Lamparter
2012-09-02 21:48 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-04 13:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Christian Lamparter
2012-09-04 14:15 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-04 14:33 ` Dan Williams
2012-09-04 14:37 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-09-04 14:54 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-07 12:17 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-07 15:47 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-09-07 15:55 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-07 16:10 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-09-07 16:15 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-07 16:26 ` Christian Lamparter
[not found] ` <201209071825.13588.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
[not found] ` <1347035277.4256.33.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
2012-09-07 17:01 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-09-07 17:09 ` Johannes Berg
2012-09-07 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346769429.3737.30.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).