linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/6] wifi: Don't spam logs with 'Found new beacon' messages.
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:20:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355350801.9708.24.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355350635.9708.23.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121212_231701_848012_2B205976)

On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 23:17 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 14:15 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 12/12/2012 02:08 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 13:54 -0800, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> > >> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> > >>
> > >> We saw logs fill with this (at very high speeds):
> > >>
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>   net/wireless/reg.c |   11 ++++++-----
> > >>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
> > >> index 6e53089..8aa7867 100644
> > >> --- a/net/wireless/reg.c
> > >> +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
> > >> @@ -2067,11 +2067,12 @@ int regulatory_hint_found_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> > >>   	if (!reg_beacon)
> > >>   		return -ENOMEM;
> > >>
> > >> -	REG_DBG_PRINT("Found new beacon on "
> > >
> > > Why not just disable the config option for it if you don't care?
> > 
> > I don't mind seeing it, just don't want thousands of them in my logs
> > in a very short amount of time.  Maybe I was just hitting some
> > other bug, and there is no valid reason for this to ever spam?
> 
> Quite likely, since I think it's supposed to happen only once for each
> channel unless you reset the regulatory (but that would cause more
> messages? I think?)

Ah, no, I get it. It is related to your many interfaces :-)

The thing is that when a beacon comes in it schedules a work item, and
that work item only sets the beacon_found to true. Now since you have a
ton of interfaces each beacon can be processed many times, and you get a
ton of work items, and ... ouch.

Not sure how the locking works here so can't really suggest a fix right
now.

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-12 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 21:54 [RFC 1/6] ath9k: Report txerr-filtered errors in debugfs greearb
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 2/6] wifi: Don't spam logs with 'Found new beacon' messages greearb
2012-12-12 22:08   ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:15     ` Ben Greear
2012-12-12 22:17       ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:20         ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-12-12 22:24           ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-13 20:31             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 3/6] mac80211: Check for NULL in get-ethtool-stats logic greearb
2012-12-12 22:02   ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:11     ` Ben Greear
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 4/6] mac80211: Allow disabling SGI-20 greearb
2012-12-12 22:06   ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:08     ` Ben Greear
2012-12-13  0:58     ` Ben Greear
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 5/6] ath9k: Report rx-crc-errors in ethtool stats greearb
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 6/6] ath9k: Allow using ath9k-rate-control without forcing it greearb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1355350801.9708.24.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).