From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Marco Porsch <marco@cozybit.com>
Cc: mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com, jouni@qca.qualcomm.com,
vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com, senthilb@qca.qualcomm.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.open80211s.org,
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 2/3] mac80211: mesh power save doze scheduling
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:59:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360767542.8868.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5118DE25.9090908@cozybit.com> (sfid-20130211_130353_076657_C8F3A646)
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 13:03 +0100, Marco Porsch wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 10:57 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 11:09 +0100, Marco Porsch wrote:
> >
> >>>> For mesh Awake Windows wakeup on SWBA (beacon_get_tim) and start
> >>>> a timer which triggers a doze call on expiry.
> >>>
> >>> That seems questionable -- drivers are not required to request each
> >>> beacon. I know you only want to make it work on ath9k, but I don't think
> >>> "stretching" the API, without even documenting it, is a good idea.
> >>
> >> Currently, we already use ieee80211_beacon_get_tim as time reference for
> >> mesh sync's adjust_tbtt. And, as far as I know, all mesh-capable drivers
> >> use the call for each and every beacon.
> >
> > Oops, why did I miss that before? :-)
> >
> >> So what would you recommend: keep using beacon_get and adding
> >> documentation - or - creating an exported callback for awake_window_start?
> >
> > I guess you could add it... However, I don't really fully understand.
> > There's no guarantee that fetching the beacon is done anywhere close to
> > TBTT? Or does ath9k happen to do it just after TXing a beacon? You're
> > encoding quite a lot of ath9k-specific assumptions here it seems?
>
> I think the assumption is currently correct for ath5k, ath9k, ath9k_htc,
> carl9170 and rt2800 (that's as far as I checked). All of these fetch a
> beacon on SWBA/PRETBTT interrupt (more or less) immediately before TBTT.
It's still pretty bad to make that assumption implicitly -- I think you
should at least document it as a big todo item :)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-13 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-06 11:48 [RFCv2 0/3] mesh power save - hardware doze Marco Porsch
2013-02-06 11:48 ` [RFCv2 1/3] mac80211: move mesh sync beacon handler into neighbour_update Marco Porsch
2013-02-06 11:48 ` [RFCv2 2/3] mac80211: mesh power save doze scheduling Marco Porsch
2013-02-08 9:20 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-08 10:09 ` Marco Porsch
2013-02-08 21:57 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-11 12:03 ` Marco Porsch
2013-02-13 14:59 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-02-06 11:48 ` [RFCv2 3/3] ath9k: mesh powersave support Marco Porsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360767542.8868.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=devel@lists.open80211s.org \
--cc=jouni@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco@cozybit.com \
--cc=mcgrof@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=senthilb@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).