From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Vladimir Kondratiev <qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>,
Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"John W . Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] P2P find offload
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:47:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362412079.21028.34.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3408094.SIuA27EmQ5@lx-vladimir>
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 14:24 +0200, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> Enable p2p find phase offload to the driver.
> Add methods for the struct cfg80211_ops, like
>
> int (*start_p2p_find)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> struct cfg80211_p2p_find_params *params);
> void (*stop_p2p_find)(struct wiphy *wiphy);
>
> where struct cfg80211_p2p_find_params includes info elements
> to be added for probe request and probe response frames;
> social channels etc.
We had something like this before. I think you need to specify not the
wiphy but a netdev though, to know what MAC address to use. In fact, not
a netdev but a wdev, so it can work on P2P_Device type wdevs.
Also, timings? Or is that left to the driver?
> wpa_supplicant will call these methods through nl80211.
>
> Driver responsible for toggling between search and listen states,
> reporting probe request/response frames to the user space.
>
> Driver/firmware may answer to the probe request frames on itself,
> in this case probe requests are still reported.
wpa_s will need to know whether or not it responded, unless you mandate
that it must respond by itself -- not sure if you should do that though?
> To satisfy requirements for 60GHz band, additional attribute 'pcp_resolution'
> shall be added to the reported frames, indicating result of the PCP resolution.
> This attribute carries result of PCP factor comparison between probe request
> and response, as defined in the spec for 60GHz. It is enum having values
> 'undefined', 'win' and 'lose'.
?
> For the 2.4GHz band devices, PCP resolution is not used and pcp_resolution
> attribute set to 'undefined'
No ... you'd just leave out the attribute instead of having a special
undefined value.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-27 12:24 [RFC] P2P find offload Vladimir Kondratiev
2013-03-04 15:47 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-03-07 7:10 ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2013-03-07 9:31 ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2013-03-07 10:08 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-07 10:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-07 14:10 ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2013-03-10 15:43 ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2013-03-15 18:40 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-17 8:56 ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2013-03-18 20:31 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <3959922.dEpYdEMVAq@lx-vladimir>
2013-03-19 20:27 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-15 15:51 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-07 10:01 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362412079.21028.34.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jouni@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox