From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@redhat.com>,
David Spinadel <david.spinadel@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: P2P support in brcmfmac
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:38:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364395136.8388.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51530267.5020705@broadcom.com>
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:29 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > As I understand it, brcmfmac currently supports having a P2P device
> > *netdev*, which is of (wireless) type STATION (presumably), which isn't
> > something we want to support (well, I don't anyway, it's difficult to
> > discover for applications).
>
> It is a bit more subtle. After the merge window since 3.9-rc1 brcmfmac
> supports to have a P2P device *wireless dev* WITH a netdev associated as
> the old wpa_supplicant needed a network interface.
Oh, funky, I had no idea.
> However, this
> interface is only created when the driver is loaded with a module
> parameter p2pon set to 1.
You could just remove the module parameter then?
> So brcmfmac announces P2P_DEVICE support in wiphy information. This will
> cause wpa_supplicant (with P2P device patches) to create a
> *wireless_dev* interface of P2P_DEVICE type.
Right, but this wouldn't work because you don't support the interface
creation, so it would really just be an attempt to create it?
> The interim patches went in 3.9-rc1 so they end up in 3.9 without
> nl80211 user-space support. I am now suggesting to add that nl80211
> user-space support for 3.9 as well. As you indicated you do not consider
> this as an exception to the bugfix rule, I will have to look what
> happens when the new wpa_supplicant (with P2P device patches) tries to
> use the 3.9-rc1 brcmfmac.
Or you could just remove the module parameter *and* advertisting the
P2P_DEVICE interface type, that would be a very small patch to "fix" the
API by disabling it for that kernel version. OTOH, I'm not sure if
that's a concern for you. For me, it wouldn't be a concern because we
mostly use compat-wireless anyway, but your situation might be
different.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 11:51 P2P support in brcmfmac Arend van Spriel
2013-03-27 12:22 ` John W. Linville
2013-03-27 12:34 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-27 12:44 ` John W. Linville
2013-03-27 12:51 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-27 13:04 ` John W. Linville
2013-03-27 14:29 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-03-27 14:38 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-03-27 14:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-03-27 15:10 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364395136.8388.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=david.spinadel@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@redhat.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).