From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Hashing by VIF addr for rx of data packets.
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:46:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364993169.8351.34.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515B6D98.4060303@candelatech.com> (sfid-20130403_014533_732333_9EEA2246)
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:45 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> I notice that the rx logic currently walks through all stations when a NIC receives
> a packet.
>
> With the attached patch, total TCP download throughput goes from 70Mbps to 190Mbps on
> my test system (Atom 1.6Ghz) with 50 station VIFs receiving TCP data streams.
>
> The basic idea is to hash on the VIF addr (ie, what you see in 'ifconfig wlan0' as MAC
> address), and then look up stations using the hdr->addr1 in the rx logic.
>
> The attached patch probably breaks monitor interfaces and other VIFs other than AP and
> STA. It also changes the behaviour of PROMISC, but I'm not sure that is bad (is
> the old behaviour needed for anything useful?)
>
> I'm thinking to store a count of all VIF types on a radio, and make
> this hash code only be enabled when only STA and AP exist. Maybe later optimize
> so we can quickly find monitor or other VIF types to handle them properly.
>
> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Hmmm. I'm not really convinced this will make sense upstream. I'm kinda
fine with the single-station cache, but maintaining a whole other hash
table seems too much overhead for every use case but yours.
> + /* If we have only station and AP interfaces, then hash on
> + * the destination MAC (ie, local sdata MAC). Could add other
> + * device types as well, perhaps. This changes 'promisc' behaviour,
> + * but not sure that is a bad thing.
> + */
> + if (!is_multicast_ether_addr(hdr->addr1)) {
> + sta = sta_info_get_by_vif(local, hdr->addr1);
AFAICT, this is also wrong for TDLS and other cases where we might
receive a frame that's not from the AP, even if it's only by accident or
from an attacker.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 23:45 RFC: Hashing by VIF addr for rx of data packets Ben Greear
2013-04-03 12:46 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-04-03 13:37 ` Ben Greear
2013-04-03 13:42 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364993169.8351.34.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).