From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Cc: radiotap@NetBSD.org, simon@superduper.net,
Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:55:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367934904.8328.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367934867.8328.31.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 09:40 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Am 02.05.2013 22:44, schrieb Johannes Berg:
> > > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:34 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > >
> > >>> With this I believe we have everything needed to start the 3 week
> > >>> comment period.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I guess there was plenty of time. I would have preferred a
> > > separate thread, but I guess there's little enough traffic on this list
> > > so it doesn't really matter.
> > >
> > >> There is a bit more then 3 week now. I would like to have this approved :)
> > >> Are there any thing needed to finish this?
> > >
> > > http://www.radiotap.org/Standardisation
> > >
> > > johannes
> > >
> >
> > ping.
> >
> > Johannes, are you the one who says last word on standardisation for
> > radiotap?
>
> No? I thought the link made that pretty clear.
>
> But since nobody poked holes in this and it's been a long time, I think
> you should probably just post "this has been adopted now" ...
Or actually, go to step 5, preferably reposting it as a separate thread.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 14:34 Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-02 20:44 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-03 19:53 ` Patches for STBC Standartisation Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-03 19:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] mac80211: add STBC flag for radiotap Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-03 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath9k: remove useless flag conversation Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-03 19:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: check for Rx-STBC flag and pass it to ieee80211 Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-03 19:53 ` [PATCH] tcpdump: add STBC Rx support Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-03 19:58 ` Guy Harris
2013-05-03 20:04 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-04 6:22 ` Patch for radiotap library Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-07 7:40 ` Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-07 13:54 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 13:55 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-05-07 14:25 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-07 14:59 ` Jonathan Bither
2013-05-07 15:03 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-05-07 16:09 ` Jonathan Bither
2013-05-03 21:12 ` Simon Barber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367934904.8328.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=radiotap@NetBSD.org \
--cc=simon@superduper.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).