From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:58072 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753507Ab3EPNWP (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 09:22:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1368710523.8387.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130516_152230_751381_F20223D6) Subject: Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS (repost 3) From: Johannes Berg To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: radiotap@NetBSD.org, simon@superduper.net, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:22:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5194A06A.3000103@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130516_110137_244706_0B9B5695) References: <518B72AE.4010402@rempel-privat.de> <5194A06A.3000103@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130516_110137_244706_0B9B5695) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:01 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Hallo all, > > so, there is no updates or critic on this topic. That mean, every thing > is OK. I tend to agree. > I assume "suggested-fields/MCS extension for STBC and Ness" > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS%20extension%20for%20STBC%20and%20Ness > > can be moved to "defined-fields/MCS" > http://www.radiotap.org/defined-fields/MCS > > Johannes, your word ;) I don't really have any say, but go for it, for all I care :) johannes