From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@cozybit.com>
Cc: linux-wirelss <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
open80211s <devel@lists.open80211s.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/12] mac80211: notify bridge when leaving mesh
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 22:32:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369427550.13623.3.camel@johannes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG6hwVPah-8FjH=ntFPzxMzXi5ePcmG-UEhdsvEgHkJVE9khYQ@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20130522_030953_079668_4D426723)
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 18:09 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
> Hey, Sorry for the late response.
Me too :)
> >> netif_carrier_off(sdata->dev);
> >> + if (sdata->dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
> >> + /* stop bridge transmissions */
> >> + call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGE, sdata->dev);
> >
> > Err, this seems like a really bad hack? I don't really think drivers
> > should call that?
>
> Why not? We're just notifying the bridge interface that this port has
> gone down, to avoid dereferencing a null pointer (on bridge flood
> traffic) after the mesh_bss has been removed.
>
> Is cfg80211_leave_mesh() an acceptable location for this fix?
I'm not really convinced it's an acceptable fix in itself? Why should we
ever have to call netdev notifiers, that seems odd to me. Also why would
that prevent a crash? Wouldn't we just drop packets for the mesh if we
aren't joined in a mesh any more? Or something like that? Accessing the
priv flags and then calling the netdev notifiers seems really strange to
me. If this was necessary, then wouldn't netif_carrier_off() do it
internally?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-03 2:33 [RFC 00/12] MBSS sharing across multiple interfaces Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 01/12] mac80211: track and share mesh BSSes among interfaces Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-07 13:37 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 14:08 ` Bob Copeland
2013-05-07 14:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 15:55 ` Bob Copeland
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 02/12] mac80211: mesh: add function to tx on all other mbss ifaces Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 03/12] mac80211: use all MBSS interfaces for path selection Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-07 13:40 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 14:11 ` Bob Copeland
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 04/12] mac80211: assign outgoing interface with nexthop Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 05/12] mac80211: forward frames on correct mbss-shared interface Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 06/12] mac80211: notify bridge when leaving mesh Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-07 13:42 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-22 1:09 ` Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-24 20:32 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-05-28 17:01 ` Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-29 16:11 ` Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 07/12] mac80211: make RMC per-mbss Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 08/12] mac80211: forward group frames on mbss-shared interfaces Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:33 ` [RFC 09/12] mac80211: add shared-mbss transmit path Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:34 ` [RFC 10/12] mac08211: add shared-mbss receive path handling Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:34 ` [RFC 11/12] {nl,mac}80211: specify MBSS sharing on/off Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 2:34 ` [RFC 12/12] {nl,mac}80211: allow mpath dump to span local MBSS Thomas Pedersen
2013-05-03 13:25 ` [RFC 00/12] MBSS sharing across multiple interfaces Chaoxing Lin
[not found] ` <CAEFj987wqVTmN1eCCfqm2M16p5j8JtOn5AcKE0fETmsn+FyENg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-03 14:07 ` Chaoxing Lin
2013-05-03 14:35 ` Bob Copeland
[not found] ` <CAEFj986Avr_C5Hm4uRs0oP2ZRa-jnn6eRCJH71jkehcCuQ7iGQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-03 15:41 ` Bob Copeland
2013-05-07 13:44 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369427550.13623.3.camel@johannes \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=devel@lists.open80211s.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=thomas@cozybit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).