From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>,
"hostap@lists.shmoo.com" <hostap@lists.shmoo.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Jithu Jance <jithu@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: P2P Device support: how to deal with p2p_no_group_iface option
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:03:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369645418.8229.17.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A09F43.5030004@broadcom.com>
Hi,
> I looked into issues around hwsim p2p tests and got all but one p2p test
> passing now (test_autogo_tdls). I had to remove the p2p_no_group_iface
> option from the p2px.conf files, because otherwise it tries to change
> the P2P management interface into a P2P group interface. When using
> P2P_DEVICE and P2P management interface this is not allowed by
> mac80211_hwsim. Also for brcmfmac the P2P_DEVICE interface is dedicated
> and can only be added/deleted, but not changed. Not sure if that is true
> for iwlmvm as well.
>
> So I would like to discuss how to deal with the p2p_no_group_iface
> option. As P2P_DEVICE is a new concept the name of the option may no
> longer match what it intends. Is the option to force all P2P operations
> to be done on a single interface, ie. wlan0 (or whatever is specified on
> the command line) and no P2P_DEVICE is to be created. Or should it
> change the interface from the command line as P2P group interface.
I don't think I'd do either of those. Not creating P2P_DEVICE will
simply not work with drivers expecting it, and changing iftype to/from
P2P-Device isn't supported since it would delete/create the netdev.
I don't really see much choice but reject (or ignore) this option for
drivers using P2P_DEVICE. Why would anyone *really* want P2P operation
on wlan0 when another interface can be used?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-27 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-25 11:23 P2P Device support: how to deal with p2p_no_group_iface option Arend van Spriel
2013-05-27 9:03 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-05-27 13:56 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-05-27 13:59 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-27 14:03 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-05-27 15:53 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-27 17:40 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-05-27 18:11 ` Jouni Malinen
2013-05-27 19:15 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-27 19:20 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-05-27 19:27 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-27 18:51 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369645418.8229.17.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=hostap@lists.shmoo.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=jithu@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).