From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49]:36661 "EHLO mail-pb0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336Ab3HBNLY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:11:24 -0400 Message-ID: <1375449082.3927.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (sfid-20130802_151132_530453_32527D50) Subject: Re: changing dev->needed_headroom/needed_tailroom? From: Eric Dumazet To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Johannes Berg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:11:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1375433758.24371.20.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> References: <1374850210.8248.59.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1375433758.24371.20.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 10:55 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I don't think this is safe when the interface is running (even if > carrier is off). Some functions may read dev->needed_headroom twice and > rely on getting the same value each time. It should be no problem. Remaining unsafe places should be fixed. We already had this discussion in the past, and some patches were issued. Check commit ae641949df01b85117845bec45328eab6d6fada1 ("net: Remove all uses of LL_ALLOCATED_SPACE")