From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: implement STA CSA for drivers using channel contexts
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376568235.14084.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376395438-24788-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> (sfid-20130813_140413_518220_6596D641)
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 15:03 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
> This isn't very well tested yet, but seems to work with a TI wl18xx card.
> The single-role/single-channel support is enough to pass the 11h certification.
:-)
> net/mac80211/cfg.c | 5 +++++
> net/mac80211/chan.c | 5 -----
> net/mac80211/mlme.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> index 7aa38ce..beb1c2a 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> @@ -2872,6 +2872,11 @@ void ieee80211_csa_finalize_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (WARN_ON(err < 0))
> return;
>
> + if (!local->use_chanctx) {
> + local->_oper_chandef = local->csa_chandef;
> + ieee80211_hw_config(local, 0);
> + }
I don't really understand this part - I think you should add some
documentation or something?
> @@ -453,11 +453,6 @@ int ieee80211_vif_change_channel(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> chanctx_changed |= IEEE80211_CHANCTX_CHANGE_CHANNEL;
> drv_change_chanctx(local, ctx, chanctx_changed);
>
> - if (!local->use_chanctx) {
> - local->_oper_chandef = *chandef;
> - ieee80211_hw_config(local, 0);
> - }
I really don't like it either - this was here so that no other code
really needed to be worried about non-chanctx drivers.
> @@ -1180,17 +1196,27 @@ ieee80211_sta_process_chanswitch(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> }
>
> ifmgd->flags |= IEEE80211_STA_CSA_RECEIVED;
> + sdata->vif.csa_active = true;
I don't think we can just do this - this isn't going to result in good
behaviour for multi-vif drivers and in particular I'm pretty sure with
the MVM driver this would result in bad behaviour.
If you really want to do this I think it needs to be optional.
Also the documentation for the chanctx channel change probably needs to
be updated, etc.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 12:03 [PATCH] mac80211: implement STA CSA for drivers using channel contexts Arik Nemtsov
2013-08-15 12:03 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-08-15 16:07 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-08-16 10:56 ` Johannes Berg
2013-08-16 20:09 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-08-23 14:01 ` Johannes Berg
2013-08-25 13:14 ` Arik Nemtsov
2013-08-30 11:38 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376568235.14084.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=arik@wizery.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox