From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:52565 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751795Ab3KATlp (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:41:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1383334899.14379.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20131101_204148_347266_CF6C739C) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] wireless-regdb: optimize two of DE's rules From: Johannes Berg To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:41:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1383314131-20774-7-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (sfid-20131101_145552_151746_60973670) References: <1383314131-20774-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1383314131-20774-7-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (sfid-20131101_145552_151746_60973670) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:55 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > - # entry 303005 > - (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > - # entries 304002 and 305002 > - (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > + # entry 303005, 304002 and 305002 should probably say entries :) Btw, according to the formal definition that the kernel uses, having two versus one rule actually *is* different. Having two stops you from using a channel that crosses the boundary. In practice, this kind of interpretation is actually cumbersome and error-prone, which I've pointed out long ago together with my suggestion to actually change it, but I wanted to point it out anyway. johannes