From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:42976 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755961Ab3KFKLr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 05:11:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1383732704.14307.18.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20131106_111151_069275_BE7AF41D) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] cfg80211: allow beaconing after DFS CAC From: Johannes Berg To: Janusz Dziedzic Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 11:11:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1383659329-11023-5-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> (sfid-20131105_144906_140973_6384EC66) References: <1383659329-11023-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> <1383659329-11023-5-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> (sfid-20131105_144906_140973_6384EC66) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:48 +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > After going throught the Channel Availability Check (CAC) > required by DFS enable beaconing. Channels that have > gone through a CAC will be in the NL80211_DFS_AVAILABLE > state. Without this change APs don't start beaconing > after a successful CAC. > Change also cfg80211_secondary_chans_ok() where handle > prohibited_flags as prohibited. I can't really understand this commit message - can you please rephrase it? johannes