From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:43373 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756390Ab3KFMGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 07:06:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1383739595.14307.41.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20131106_130641_045573_9300C29B) Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/2] mac80211: only set CSA beacon when at least one beacon must be transmitted From: Johannes Berg To: "Coelho, Luciano" Cc: Simon Wunderlich , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:06:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1383739343.4256.58.camel@porter.coelho.fi> References: <1383684854-21663-1-git-send-email-luciano.coelho@intel.com> <1383684854-21663-2-git-send-email-luciano.coelho@intel.com> <201311061247.48777.sw@simonwunderlich.de> <1383739343.4256.58.camel@porter.coelho.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:03 +0000, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > > Even if we don't allow count <=1 from userspace as Johannes suggested, > > Ah, I had misunderstood Johannes. I thought he meant to reject the > patch. :P > > Rejecting count <= 1 could be a temporary solution until we implement > the action frames properly. Unless we decide that the action frames > should be handled in userspace as you proposed. Well even then - the question is who would ever want to use and test count<=1? johannes